All posts by CPNN Coordinator

About CPNN Coordinator

Dr David Adams is the coordinator of the Culture of Peace News Network. He retired in 2001 from UNESCO where he was the Director of the Unit for the International Year for the Culture of Peace, proclaimed for the Year 2000 by the United Nations General Assembly.

For an Urgent change in Global Governance

FREE FLOW OF INFORMATION .

An article by Federico Mayor Zaragoza* in Other News (translation by CPNN)

“No challenge is beyond the creative capacity of the human species.”
J. F. Kennedy, June 1963.

A turning point has arrived where situations of an irreversible nature have been reached. We must ensure that circumstances do not occur that inevitably require new solutions. And that despair does not spread. A citizenry that is aware of its equal dignity and capable of expressing itself that must, at last, put into practice the lucid Charter of the United Nations: “We, the peoples… have resolved to spare succeeding generations the horror of war.” War and other “horrors,” such as the deterioration of the environment and, therefore, of the habitability of planet Earth.

The urgent time has come to act, to move from being impassive spectators of what happens to being very diligent actors. Not one more day of “silent listeners.” It is time for action, not to be simple receivers of frequently biased information, but actors who participate, each in our own field, keeping in mind Burke’s maxim: “No one makes a greater mistake than he who does nothing because he thinks he could do only very little.” Every seed, without exception, is necessary. Every grain of sand. Every drop.

There are moments, very few, when suddenly change is possible. The radical change that is required can only be imagined as the result of a great global clamor of “We, the peoples”, finally capable, with a resolute attitude, of carrying out the transition from force to words, from imposition to joint reflection.

It is necessary and urgent that many voices be mobilized, aware that now – equal in dignity and capable of participating – we must act without further delay. Yes: now, for the first time in history, “We, the peoples…” can achieve the removal of the veto in the United Nations … and in the European Union, also disqualified from decision-making by the requirement of “unanimity”, the antithesis of democracy.

(Article continued in the column on the right)

(Click here for the original Spanish version of the article)

Questions related to this article:

Where in the world can we find good leadership today?

(Article continued from the column on the left)

It is imperative to address the great challenges on a global scale, before their solution is no longer possible. The major priorities of food, access to drinking water, quality health services, care for the environment, education, emigration… are challenges to which we must respond together.

Inventing the future. Through modern technology, the best expression of the voice of the people, of solidarity at a global level, can take place. Civil society now has, in addition to its undeniable leading role in solidarity aid, the possibility of making itself heard.

The human species yearns for, dreams of, a “new beginning”, where instead of preparing for war, it achieves peace by listening, understanding, uniting voices and efforts.

In 79 years (since 1945) it has NOT been possible to apply the UN Charter, to fulfill the will of “We, the peoples…”, always silenced by the veto, by plutocratic and supremacist governance. It was Eisenhower, the President of the United States, who had the courage, on January 20, 1961, to convey to his successor, John Fitzgerald Kennedy, and to the American people, that it was not the president who really ruled in America, but the “military-industrial complex.” From President Wilson’s creation of the League of Nations at the end of the First World War to Roosevelt’s founding of the United Nations, the opportunities for the transition of the power of the word have progressively faded. Now, as I continue to stress the time has come for “We, the peoples…”

And what must we do immediately, thinking of future generations? It is not a question of economic, political, social dispositions… It is, above all, a question of inventing a different future. In this regard, I will never forget what Professor Hans Krebs, Nobel Prize winner in Biochemistry, told me in his Oxford laboratory: “The solution is not in these sophisticated instruments, nor in the collection of data… The solution is to think what no one has thought before”… Yes: each human being, is unique and capable of creating, our hope.

Let us give wings to the human species so that, without vetoes, it may act democratically for the great transition from the force to the word.

The world is entering a new era. We have many things to preserve for the future and many others to change decisively. At last, the people. At last, the voice of the people. At last, citizen power. At last, the word and not the force. A culture of peace and never again a culture of war.

– – – –

*Federico Mayor Zaragoza (Barcelona, ​​1934) Doctor in Pharmacy from the Complutense University of Madrid (1958), has been a professor at different Spanish universities and has held numerous political positions, including that of Minister of Education and Science (1981-82). Between 1987 and 1999 he was Director General of UNESCO. He is currently President of the Foundation for a Culture of Peace.

At the Fête de l’Huma, independent media in full swing

FREE FLOW OF INFORMATION . .

An article by Juliette Quef in Vert.eco (translation by CPNN)

It’s urgent: in the face of the extreme right and the “bollorisation” of information, the ecosystem of “Indés” is joining forces by means of the Village of Independent Media at the Fête de l’Huma, the launch of a cooperative to finance them and a House of Free Media.

“It’s great that you’re here”, “it’s nice to see the independent media gathered together”: this weekend, La déferlante, Basta, Blast, Politis, Streetpress, Fakir, Reporterre, l’Age de Faire, Au poste, Mediapart, Socialter, Le média, Le chiffon, Reporters sans frontières, Acrimed, and of course Vert, were gathered under a huge 400 m² marquee, in the heart of the Fête de l’Huma, in Plessis-Pâté (Essonne). The 89th edition of the Fête attracted more than 450,000 participants in three days.

In the Village, at the center of the twenty or so stands, the conference space was filled with people and hosted rich discussions on sexist and sexual violence, freedom of the press and environmental mobilizations against the far right.


From September 13 to 15 at the Fête de l’Huma, the Village of Independent Media brought together around twenty media outlets. © Margot Desmons / Vert

Fight against the far right and the “bollorization” of the world

This first edition of the Independent Media Village at the Fête de l’Huma has its roots in the rallies against the far right, which were held on June 27 and July 3, Place de la République, in Paris. Organized in just a few days by the “Indés” and civil society, each of them brought together some 30,000 participants (our report).

“At that point, the priority was no longer our media but the event itself,” says Mathieu Molard, editor-in-chief of Streetpress, one of the initiators of the rallies. The unity of the organizers was very strong and we had the impression of having contributed, through these rallies and our investigations, to preventing the far right from gaining power.” With these links strengthened in the face of the emergency, the newspaper L’Humanité then offered to host the “Indés” at the Fête de l’Huma.

“The Independent Media Village was a huge success, we were always full,” rejoices Agnès Rousseaux, director of Politis. For me, it is a sign of a strong demand from the public for places where the press converges and an awareness on the part of the media that there is a need to strengthen and support each other. The Village gave us visibility that we would never have had on our own. Uniting allows us to increase our impact and our audience tenfold.”

(continued on right column)

(Click here for the French original of this article.)

Questions related to this article:

Free flow of information, How is it important for a culture of peace?

(continued from left column)

Coop-media: financing the “Indés”, the nerve of the war

Faced with the rise of the extreme right, the actors of the social and solidarity economy (ESS) have also mobilized to accelerate their Coop-media project, a cooperative intended to finance independent media. Its launch is scheduled for October 9, at the Climate Academy, in Paris.

“Between ESS and independent media, we have the same challenges,” says Lucie Anizon, general secretary of Enercoop and one of the coordinators of Coop-media. We are facing behemoths and the alternatives are struggling.” The idea is to raise funds to participate in the financing of committed media that carry “humanist and progressive values ​​for a more ecological, united and democratic society.”

Starting October 9, citizens, media and businesses will be able to take shares in Coop-media and participate in the governance of the cooperative according to the principle of 1 person = 1 vote. The fundraising will then make it possible to open calls for projects from 2025.

“I discovered a very disunited ecosystem of independent media,” confides Lucie Anizon. In the cooperative community, we know how to organize ourselves and we know that solidarity is the key to resilience.”

The initiative that has been rather well received by information professionals. “We lack structures that come to finance our media,” notes Mathieu Molard. “Banks do not understand our economic models. For example, they think that donations are not reliable. We have difficulty finding money, even public money, to develop ourselves, and this forces us to turn to private patrons.”

A House of Free Media to Welcome Everyone

After ten years of effort and an aborted project, the Paris Council has now voted unanimously to sell a building located at 70 boulevard Barbès, in the 18th arrondissement of Paris, to the left-wing millionaire Olivier Legrain, patron of the independent press and several refugee aid associations, and to the Bellevilles real estate company, to create a House of Free Media.

With a surface area of ​​4,000 m², it should accommodate, from the end of 2026, the premises of dozens of independent media and their ecosystem, video studios, as well as a café-bookstore and coworking spaces. The goal: to contribute to the defense of freedom of the press and pluralism in the media. “We want to create an emblematic place for freedom of the press in Paris,” explains Agnès Rousseaux. A space of excitement and abundance to wage the cultural battle and experiment with new ways of producing and disseminating information.”

– – –

If you wish to make a comment on this article, you may write to coordinator@cpnn-world.org with the title “Comment on (name of article)” and we will put your comment on line. Because of the flood of spam, we have discontinued the direct application of comments.

UN General Assembly demands Israel end ‘unlawful presence’ in Occupied Palestinian Territory

. . HUMAN RIGHTS . .

An article from the United Nations

The United Nations General Assembly on Wednesday [September 18] voted overwhelmingly to adopt a resolution that demands that Israel “brings to an end without delay its unlawful presence” in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.

With a recorded vote of 124 nations in favour, 14 against, and 43 abstentions, the resolution calls for Israel to comply with international law and withdraw its military forces, immediately cease all new settlement activity, evacuate all settlers from occupied land, and dismantle parts of the separation wall it constructed inside the occupied West Bank.

[Editor’s note: Click here for a full listing of how the countries voted.]


UN Photo/Evan Schneider Result of the General Assembly vote on a draft resolution on the ICJ advisory opinion on the legal consequences arising from Israel’s policies and practices in the Occupied Palestinian Territory

The General Assembly further demanded that Israel return land and other “immovable property”, as well as all assets seized since the occupation began in 1967, and all cultural property and assets taken from Palestinians and Palestinian institutions.

The resolution also demands Israel allow all Palestinians displaced during the occupation to return to their place of origin and make reparation for the damage caused by its occupation.

The resolution stems from the advisory opinion  issued by the International Court of Justice  (ICJ) in July, in which the Court declared that Israel’s continued presence in the Territory “is unlawful”, and that “all States are under an obligation not to recognize” the decades-long occupation.

Click here for the full text of the resolution  and here for our live coverage of the meeting.

Threat to peace and security

The Assembly “strongly deplored the continued and total disregard and breaches” by the Government of Israel of its obligations under the UN Charter, international law and UN resolutions, stressing that such breaches “seriously threaten” regional and international peace and security.

It also recognized that Israel “must be held to account for any violations” of international law in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including of international humanitarian and human rights laws.

The text says Israel “must bear the legal consequences of all its internationally wrongful acts, including by making reparation for the injury, including any damage, caused by such acts.”

The General Assembly highlighted the need for the establishment of an international mechanism for reparations to address damage, loss, or injury caused by Israel’s actions.

It also called for creating an international register of damage caused, to document evidence and related claims.

(continued in right column)

Question related to this article:

How can war crimes be documented, stopped, punished and prevented?

How can a culture of peace be established in the Middle East?

(continued from left column)

International conference

The resolution also includes a decision to convene an international conference during the Assembly’s current session to implement UN resolutions pertaining to the question of Palestine and the two-State solution for the achievement of a just, lasting and comprehensive peace in the Middle East.

Additionally, the Assembly requested the UN Secretary-General to present proposals for a mechanism to follow up on Israel’s violations of article 3 of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, as identified by the ICJ.

Article 3 refers to racial segregation and apartheid and the undertaking by International Convention’s States Parties to prevent, prohibit and eradicate all practices of this nature in territories under their jurisdiction.

Call on States

In its resolution, the General Assembly called upon all UN Member States to comply with their obligations under international law and take concrete steps to address Israel’s ongoing presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.

The Assembly urged States to refrain from recognizing Israel’s presence in the Territory as lawful and to ensure that they do not provide aid or assistance in maintaining the situation created by the occupation. This includes taking measures to prevent their nationals, companies, and entities under their jurisdiction from engaging in activities that support or sustain Israel’s occupation.

Additionally, the Assembly called on States to cease importing products originating from Israeli settlements and to halt the transfer of arms, munitions, and related equipment to Israel in cases where there are reasonable grounds to suspect they may be used in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.

Moreover, the resolution urged States to implement sanctions, such as travel bans and asset freezes, against individuals and entities involved in maintaining Israel’s unlawful presence in the Territory. This includes addressing issues related to settler violence and ensuring that those engaged in these activities face legal and financial consequences.
Adjournment

Finally, the Assembly temporarily adjourned its tenth emergency special session and authorized the President of the General Assembly to reconvene the session upon request from Member States.

The special session is a continuation of the tenth emergency special session of the General Assembly that last met in May amid the ongoing crisis in Gaza, during which it adopted a resolution , laying out additional rights for the State of Palestine’s participation in Assembly meetings.

That resolution did not grant Palestine the right to vote or put forward its candidature to UN Main Organs such as the Security Council or the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC).

It also did not confer membership to the State of Palestine, which requires a specific recommendation from the Security Council.

– – – – – –

If you wish to make a comment on this article, you may write to coordinator@cpnn-world.org with the title “Comment on (name of article)” and we will put your comment on line. Because of the flood of spam, we have discontinued the direct application of comments.

Secretary-General’s remarks to the UN Peace Bell Ceremony

FREE FLOW OF INFORMATION

An article from the United Nations

Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen,
 
We come together today to sound the call for peace. 

Here at the United Nations, peace is our raison d’être, our guiding light, and our founding creed. 


Secretary-General António Guterres rings the Peace Bell during the ceremony in observance of the International Day of Peace. PHOTO:UN/Cia Pak

Yet peace is under threat.

War is on the march. 

From the Middle East, to Sudan, Ukraine, and beyond, we see bullets and bombs maim and kill; bodies piled high; populations traumatised; and buildings reduced to rubble.  

Meanwhile, the foundations of a peaceful world are fracturing. 

Geo-political divisions are widening. 

Inequalities are growing. 

Disinformation is fanning the flames of hate. 

New technologies are being weaponised with no guardrails. 

And the climate crisis is fuelling instability: depleting resources, and forcing people from their homes. 

International institutions must be better positioned to respond. 

(continued in right column)

Question(s) related to this article:

What is happening this year (2024) for the International Day of Peace?

(continued from left column)

And we have a chance for change. 

Later this month, at the Summit of the Future, we can begin the process of reform and revitalisation: 

By adapting multilateral institutions to today’s reality, instead of the reality of the Second World War; 

By advancing a New Agenda for Peace;

By revitalising the Sustainable Development Goals; 

By protecting human rights;  

By tackling the point where climate and security meet;

By agreeing guardrails on new technologies in conflict; 

By defending and advancing gender equality; 

By combatting racism and discrimination;

And by securing full and meaningful participation in civic life and peacebuilding –particularly young people, women and girls, and other historically marginalised communities. 

In short, we must “cultivate a culture of peace.”

That is the theme of this year’s International Day of Peace. 

And it is a cause all us devotees of peace and justice must rally behind, this day and everyday – through the Summit of the Future and beyond. 

That is the call we make today. 

May it ring out around the world.  

Before I sound the peace bell, please join me in a moment of silence to reflect on the meaning and necessity of peace – and the way in which each of us can nurture the conditions needed for a peaceful world to flourish.

– – – – – –

If you wish to make a comment on this article, you may write to coordinator@cpnn-world.org with the title “Comment on (name of article)” and we will put your comment on line. Because of the flood of spam, we have discontinued the direct application of comments.

Character Strengths That Support Peacebuilding

.. DEMOCRATIC PARTICIPATION ..

Special to CPNN from Dr. Steven Handwerker*

” Dialogue must transform recrimination…innovative justice has to displace vengeance…determination over a long period of time is required to overcome entrenched forces… (and a ) ..transformation of motivation must accompany action.” (Hopkins, 2000)

      Throughout the course of human history, there is no doubt, that often, the outcome of a violent and/or potentially violent encounter is dependent upon the character strengths of the negotiators and peace workers. In this practitioner’s 50-year history in the realms of peace building, as a clinician, mediator, and educator, five traits and qualities were essential.


Photo of Nobel Peace Prize winners on the cover of the Hopkins book

– First, is clarity and faith in intent to create peace (Hopkins 2000), (Nelson 2021) and (Alston 2010).

– Second, not necessarily in order of significance, is empathy/compassion and perspective taking (Hopkins 2000), (Hart 1997), (Groot 2023), (Rogers1980).

– Third, is the vital need to be authentic in all expressions and representations of effort to build peace (Stewart 2021), (Groot 2023).

– Fourth, is Hope (Saleem 2023).

– The fifth quality is perseverance (Zomeren 2018) in the intent and practice, with constant correction in modifying efforts, to move toward the goal of peace (Ueshiba 1992), (Valez 2021). 

From 1997, in the arena of the American Psychological Association, within the divisions of Humanistic Psychology, Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, Peace Psychology, and International Psychology, a working group was established to build peace in each of these venues through various efforts. This has been manifest in over 200 symposia, ongoing endeavors, newsletter articles, and working group meetings and discussions where examples of the applications of these character strengths were presented.

Community work in Haiti

For many years the international focus of our peace work has been focused on the economically and environmentally devastated population of Haiti. The work included humanitarian assistance and trauma relief as well as economic support. We worked with faith leaders, corporate leaders, NGOs and colleagues on behalf of these displaced and traumatized people. In addition, employment opportunities were created. The engagement of community-academic partnerships with community psychologists allowed for effective collaborative actions. Perspective taking within a cultural-relational perspective (Zomeren, 2018) helped to make our ongoing evaluation process reliable and effective. Many jobs for youths and sustainable projects in academic settings were created as byproducts. (Stewart 2021) addresses these issues and describes how important evaluative actions occur with trusted partners across community sectors to provide alternatives within socioeconomic levels.

(Article continued in right column)

Questions for this article:

How important is community development for a culture of peace?

(Article continued from left column)

We examined underlying processes and thereby administered and maintained a humanitarian and sustainable initiative for several years. We were able to infuse hope into the populace for this period of time (Saleem, 2023) which significantly moderated the relationship between an intolerance of uncertainty and psychological wellbeing.  This highlighted the importance of hope as a protective factor within a highly compromised population. Hope is a critical coping strategy, within an environment of a humanitarian and sustainable initiative along with economic support (Saleem, Appiah-Boateng, 2023).  As Tolstoy expressed, “the strongest of all warriors (in the battle to create peace) are these two – time and patience.” 

* Dr. Handwerker is a licensed psychologist. His website is www.peacewk.org and his email is peacewk@peacewk.org.

References

Alston, B. (2010) editor. Chapter on “Promoting deeper values: lessons learned and some common themes” in Visions in Conflict: International Perspectives on Values and Enmity. ND Enterprises. Hawaii, USA.

Appiah-Boateng, S. , Bukari, K.N. (2023) Coping Strategies for Victims of Farmer-Herder Conflicts in Ghana. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology. 29(4), 448-458. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000655.

Groot, M., Schaafsma, J., Veerkamp, J. et. al. (2023) “Righting the Wrong”: A Multicounty Study on Peoples Perceptions of “Making  Things Right” in the Wake of Human Rights Violations. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology. 29(4), 394-408. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000691.

Handwerker, S. (2023) “On Building Societal Peace: A Humanistic and Humanitarian View. Society for Humanistic Psychology November Newsletter. 

Hart, T. (1997) Transcendental Empathy is the Therapeutic Encounter. The Humanistic Psychologist. 25(3),245-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/08873267.1997.9986885.

Hopkins, J. editor (2000). The Art of Peace. Snow Lion Publications, New York. ISBN: 1-55939-149-9. https://www.shambhala.com/snowlion_articles/the-art-of-peace/https://www.shambhala.com/snowlion_articles/the-art-of-peace/.

Nelson, L. (2021) Identifying determinants of individual peacefulness: A psychological foundation for peace education. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology. 27(2), 109-119.

Rogers, C. R.. (1980) A way of being. Houghton Mifflin. New York. 

Saleem, M. , Rizvi, T. & Bashir, I. (2023) The role of hope in buffering the influence of intolerance of uncertainty on student’s psychological well-being. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology. 29(4), 374-384. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000697.

Shifferd, K. , Hiller, P. and Swanson, D. (2016) A Global Security System: An Alternative to War. WORLDBEYONDWAR.ORG.

Stewart, D., Jesson, N., and Watson, F. (2021) Examining conflict mediation to prevent violence through multivector partnerships. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology. 27(2), 170-81.

Ueshiba, M. (1992) The art of peace. Shambhala. New York.

Valez, G. and Gerstein, L. (2021) Supporting peaceful individuals, groups and socieities. Peace psychology and peace education. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology. 27(2), 103-108.

United Nations (1948) Universal Declaration on Human Rights.

Yueh-Ting Lee and Holt, L. (2019) Chapter 6 Daoist Psychology, Peace and the Process of Transformation. in Dao and Daoist Ideas for Scientists, Humanists and Practitioners. Nova Science Publishers. New York. ISBN: 978-1-53616-544-9.

Zomeren, M. (2018) Social Movements and Political and Social Transformation: In Search of a Bigger Picture: A Cultural-Relational Perspective on Social Transformation and Violence. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology. 24(1), 171-76.

ICP course: Activating a Culture of Peace

. EDUCATION FOR PEACE .

A course of International Cities of Peace (ICP)

The purpose of this course is to answer two questions:

1. What is the Culture of Peace?

2. How can I participate in its growth?

Twenty five years ago, in 1999, the United Nations General Assembly adopted a resolution, the Declaration and Programme of Action. It launched the International Year for the Culture of Peace (2000) and a global movement during which 75 million people all over the world signed the Manifesto 2000.

The Lessons in this Course include:

1. Introduction

2. Human Rights

3. Disarmament/Nonviolence

(continued in right column)

Question for this article:

Culture of peace curricula: what are some good examples?

(continued from left column)

4. Education for Peace Sharing

5. Free Flow of Information/Dialogue

6. Sustainability/Responsible Consumption

7. Women’s Equality and Full Participation

8. Democratic Participation and Practice

9. Tolerance and Solidarity

10. Activation and Conclusion

11. Resources and Links

12. Quiz

NOTE: This course was written by three individuals who have spent their lives pursuing a Culture of Peace: Mr. David Adams, former UNESCO Unit Director and Chair of the Task Force for the U.N.’s International Year for the Culture of Peace; Ashland, Oregon’s David Wick, President of Pathways to Peace, and co-founder of the Ashland Culture of Peace Commission; and David Hazen of Eugene, Oregon, one of the original Cities of Peace and author of Love Always Wins.

– – – – – –

If you wish to make a comment on this article, you may write to coordinator@cpnn-world.org with the title “Comment on (name of article)” and we will put your comment on line. Because of the flood of spam, we have discontinued the direct application of comments.

OCDS Video about Culture of Peace

. EDUCATION FOR PEACE .

A video by Bro. Jose Arnold Alferez published in Chaindesk for OCDS, Secular Order of Discalced Carmelites

The video delves into the significance of fostering a culture of peace and the necessity of a “vaccine” to prevent war. It explores the values, attitudes, and practices that underpin peace education, focusing on respect for life, rejection of violence, and sharing. The manifesto for a culture of peace emphasizes respecting human life and dignity, rejecting violence towards vulnerable groups, and promoting inclusivity, justice, and sustainable development practices. It stresses the importance of defending freedom of expression, cultural diversity, women’s participation, and democratic principles to enhance peacebuilding efforts at individual, national, and international levels.

The video also highlights the International Day of Peace on September 21st as a platform to spread the message of peace and non-violence globally, and discusses the six components to achieving peace, including dismantling the culture of war, promoting human rights, and nurturing inner peace within families and communities.


Video

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction
Introduction to promoting a culture of peace and the need for a vaccine to prevent war.

Understanding Culture of Peace
Exploration of the culture of peace, its values, attitudes, and practices.

Peace Education
Discussion on peace education by To Sweeney and Virginia Kawagas.

Values of Culture of Peace
Explanation of the values, attitudes, and ways of living that promote a culture of peace.

Manifesto for Culture of Peace
Overview of the manifesto for a culture of peace focusing on respect for life, rejection of violence, sharing, and solidarity.

Respect for Life
Importance of respecting the life and dignity of each human being without discrimination or prejudice.

Reject Violence
Manifesto highlighting the rejection of violence in all forms, including towards vulnerable groups like children, adolescents, and women.

Share with Others
Encouragement to share time, material resources, and talents to promote inclusivity and justice for all.

(continued in right column)

Question(s) related to this article:

What are some good films and videos that promote a culture of peace?

(continued in right column)

Defend Freedom of Expression
Importance of defending freedom of expression and cultural diversity while avoiding fanaticism and rejection of others.

Preserve the Planet
Emphasis on promoting responsible consumer behavior and development practices that respect all forms of life on Earth.

Rediscover Solidarity
Promotion of women’s participation, respect for democratic principles, and creating new forms of solidarity to enhance peacebuilding efforts.

Efforts for Peace
Call to action for individuals, nations, and international organizations to work towards promoting a culture of peace and non-violence.

International Day of Peace
Recognition of the International Day of Peace on September 21st and the importance of spreading the message of peace and non-violence globally.

Path to Peace
Exploration of the six parts to peace, including dismantling the culture of war, promoting human rights, and living in harmony with the environment.

Inner Peace
Discussion on nurturing inner peace as a foundation for promoting peace within families, communities, and society.

FAQ

Q: What is the manifesto for a culture of peace?

A: The manifesto for a culture of peace focuses on values such as respect for life, rejection of violence, sharing, and solidarity.

Q: Why is it important to respect the life and dignity of each human being without discrimination or prejudice?

A: Respecting the life and dignity of each human being without discrimination or prejudice is important to promote inclusivity, justice, and peace for all.

Q: What are some of the values, attitudes, and ways of living that promote a culture of peace?

A: Values, attitudes, and ways of living that promote a culture of peace include respect for life, rejection of violence, sharing, and solidarity.

Q: How can individuals promote a culture of peace and non-violence?

A: Individuals can promote a culture of peace and non-violence by sharing time, material resources, talents, defending freedom of expression, respecting democratic principles, and creating new forms of solidarity.

Q: What is the significance of the International Day of Peace on September 21st?

A: The International Day of Peace on September 21st is significant as it emphasizes the importance of spreading the message of peace and non-violence globally.

Q: What are the six parts to peace as discussed in the file?

A: The six parts to peace include dismantling the culture of war, promoting human rights, living in harmony with the environment, nurturing inner peace, promoting women’s participation, and creating new forms of solidarity to enhance peacebuilding efforts.

– – – – – –

If you wish to make a comment on this article, you may write to coordinator@cpnn-world.org with the title “Comment on (name of article)” and we will put your comment on line. Because of the flood of spam, we have discontinued the direct application of comments.

Speech from Birmingham, UK, for Solidarity and against Racism

. TOLERANCE & SOLIDARITY .

An article from the website of We are BRIG

The recent far-right riots and violence in the UK, particularly following the tragic attack in Southport, have sparked outrage and concern among anti-racism groups and community leaders. Here’s a summary of the key statements from BRIG, Kings Heath United Against Racism, and Patrick Vernon, which collectively address the issue of ongoing racial injustice and the rise of far-right extremism in the UK.

Speech by Mukhtar Dar on behalf of Kings Heath United Against Racism

Brothers, Sisters, Comrades—

Firstly, I extend my deepest condolences to the families and friends of the three young girls murdered in the horrific knife attack, and to those who are critically injured. I also wish to pay special tribute to the heroes who confronted the attacker. My solidarity goes out to the people of Southport, particularly the Muslim community whose mosques came under siege, to the refugees who were attacked in their hotels, and to all those communities across the country—White, Black, Asian, African, Caribbean—who are standing firm against those who seek to exploit these tragic murders.

We gather here not merely as individuals, but as a force of history—a moral majority that stands unwaveringly on the side of justice, truth, and equality. We are the embodiment of hope, love, and unity. Our hearts beat as one, and in this dark hour, we stand resolute against the forces that seek to tear us apart, to make us forget our shared humanity.

We are confronted by those who thrive on division, who feed on hatred. These forces—whether driven by fascism, nationalism, or populism—seek to drive a wedge between black and white, Muslim and Christian, gay and straight, able and disabled, migrant and native. But let us remind them, let us remind the world: we are all migrants. Every single one of us. Our DNA tells the story of our ancestors’ journeys out of Africa, weaving the tapestry of migration that has shaped human civilization across Asia, Europe, Australasia, and the Americas.

The United Kingdom itself is a living testament to this migration, a vibrant mosaic of dreams and struggles from across Europe and beyond. The story of Birmingham, like that of many cities, is a story of migration—of people moving from hamlets and villages, of the Irish, of our parents from the former colonies, who came here to rebuild the ‘motherland’ after the ravages of war. We, together, built this city—a city of resilience, of hope. And when the likes of Tommy Robinson and his band of bigots speak of Christianity, let us remind them: Jesus was a migrant seeking refuge, a symbol of compassion and solidarity for all humanity.

Brother and sisters, this is not a race war. This is not a religious war. This is not merely a struggle for the Muslim community, or for refugees. No, this is a righteous struggle that calls upon each of us to take our positions in the ranks of our people’s struggle. This is a battle against the far-right forces rising across Europe, against the spectre of fascism, against the insidious seeds of bigotry, racism, and Islamophobia. This is a battle against the most reactionary, divisive, and backward forces humanity has ever faced—and yes, defeated.

(continued in right column)

Question related to this article:
 
Are we making progress against racism?

(continued from left column)

We have defeated them before. Our movement’s history is rich with victories over these forces of darkness. We defeated them at the Battle of Cable Street, where ordinary British workers stood shoulder to shoulder with the Jewish community and said, “No pasaran—they shall not pass.” We defeated them in the ghettos of Walsall, where unity and resilience sent a powerful message. Our communities, the African Caribbean and Asian communities alongside our white comrades from the labour and trade union movement fought them in the streets of Lewisham, in Brick Lane, in Manningham, in Southall, in Handsworth. Each time, we stood together, and each time, we prevailed.

But, my friends, the struggle is far from over. Today, the far-right, emboldened by the likes of Reform UK and Tommy Robinson’s Street brigade, offer no solutions aside from scapegoating, creating divisions, and preaching death and destruction. We must oppose them with every ounce of strength we possess. We must confront them in the streets and in the battle of ideas. Our arguments must be rooted in justice, in compassion, in our shared values, and in the truth that we are all one.

Yet, let us not forget those who empower these forces with their reckless racist rhetoric. We must challenge and expose the politicians who speak of ‘stopping the boats’ and other dog-whistle tactics that create fertile ground for the far-right to grow. Their words fan the flames of division and fear, providing a veneer of legitimacy to those who march through our streets with hate in their hearts. It is not enough to denounce the far-right; we must also hold accountable those in power who enable their rise.

From Southport, Rotherham, and Middlesbrough, to over 60 cities and towns, the far-right and their supporters openly rampaged, terrorising our communities, attacking our homes, our mosques, setting alight our cars, setting up roadblocks, singling out Asian, African, and Caribbean taxi drivers, pulling them out of their vehicles. In many places, the police stood by indifferent and allowed it to happen. This was not just violence; this was a pogrom. There are no legitimate grievances here, no excuses of deprivation. These were not race riots but racist riots by violent, lying racists who demonise Muslims while hiding behind a false patriotism and reactionary nostalgia for a bygone all white era.

History teaches us an unshakable truth: we must organise, we must unite, we must mobilise. Across cities, towns, and villages, let us bridge our divides to build a massive united front to defeat both state racism and fascism. Let us forge a coalition so strong, so determined, that it will consign the likes of Nigel Farage, Tommy Robinson, and their poisonous ideologies to the dustbin of history.

We are not alone, for history is on our side. We stand as the embodiment of hope, the champions of love, and the bearers of justice. We are the light that will drive out the darkness, the voices that will speak for the voiceless. So let us, united as one, reclaim our streets and our future. In our unity, there is strength; in our diversity, there is beauty; and in our solidarity, there is hope.

Together, we will rise above hate. Together, we will build a brighter tomorrow for all. We will invest the fruits of our labour not in wars, but in progress, ensuring that the wealth we create is shared by the many, not hoarded by the few. We are the defenders of the dream that all people—regardless of race, religion, gender, or background—can live in harmony and equality. Let us show the world that our unity is our strength, that our diversity is our power. Together, we will rise. Together, we will resist. Together, we will prevail.

“Make them gwan, make them run—Chase the fascists out of Brum!”

(Editor’s note: Thank you to Joe Yannielli, the CPNN reporter for this article.)

– – – – – –

If you wish to make a comment on this article, you may write to coordinator@cpnn-world.org with the title “Comment on (name of article)” and we will put your comment on line. Because of the flood of spam, we have discontinued the direct application of comments.

The Contribution of Gabon to UNESCO and the Culture of Peace

FREE FLOW OF INFORMATION

Excerpt from the website of the Gabon Review (translation by CPNN)

Drawing on his experience as a former actor in cooperation between Gabon and UNESCO, Juste Joris Tindy-Poaty takes stock of Gabonese initiatives in three key areas: the appropriation of international scientific programs, the implementation of the Program for the Management of Social Transformations (MOST), and the contribution to the Action Plan for a Culture of Peace in Africa. His analysis offers a unique perspective on Gabon’s past achievements and proposes concrete avenues for consolidating its diplomatic position within this international organization. . . .


Doctor Juste Joris Tindy-Poaty, Assistant Professor in Philosophy, Former Secretary General of the Gabonese National Commission for UNESCO (2011-2015). © DR

On the eve of the 43rd session of the General Conference, which could (we fervently hope) confirm the election of one of our own, in the person of Ambassador Noël Nelson Messone, to the post of Director-General of UNESCO, we intend to provide here some answers to the following question: what has been Gabon’s presence at UNESCO to date and what could this presence be beyond? It is as a former actor in our country’s cooperation with UNESCO that we authorize ourselves to make this contribution. . . .

The national contribution to the implementation of the “Action Plan for a Culture of Peace in Africa/Let’s Act for Peace”

Designed to call for the creation of a “Continental and Sustainable Movement for Peace”, the “Action Plan for a Culture of Peace in Africa/Let’s Act for Peace” was adopted at the end of the Pan-African Forum “Sources and Resources for a Culture of Peace”, organized jointly with the Angolan Government, UNESCO and the African Union, in Luanda (Angola), from 26 to 28 March 2013. The objective of this forum, which eventually became a Biennale of the Culture of Peace [2] , was “to draw on the sources of inspiration and the potential of the continent’s cultural, natural and human resources to identify concrete courses of action to build sustainable peace, understood as the cornerstone of endogenous development and Pan-Africanism.”

(Continued in right column)

(Click here for the original French version of this article.)

Question related to this article:

The Luanda Biennale: What is its contribution to a culture of peace in Africa?

(Continued from left column)

Represented at the Pan-African Forum in Luanda in 2013, and as such a stakeholder in the implementation of the action plan calling for the creation of a “continental and sustainable movement for peace”, Gabon immediately worked to contribute to the creation, under the aegis of UNESCO and the AU, of a certain number of networks of civil society organizations in Africa and the Diaspora, namely: (i) the “Network of foundations and research institutions for the promotion of a culture of peace in Africa” (September 2013); the “Pan-African Youth Network for the Culture of Peace” (December 2014) and the “Pan-African Women’s Network for the Culture of Peace and Sustainable Development” (June 2018). Made up of more than 50 organizations, including UNESCO chairs, the first network has its permanent secretariat provided by the “Félix Houphouët-Boigny Foundation for Peace Research”, and its headquarters is therefore based in Côte d’Ivoire, more precisely in Yamoussoukro. Initiatives of Gabon, the other two networks have their respective headquarters in Libreville.

The “Pan-African Youth Network for the Culture of Peace”, made up of about 60 organizations, including National Youth Councils, was formalized at the end of the Pan-African Forum “African Youth and the Challenge of Promoting a Culture of Peace” organized from 11 to 13 December, jointly by the Omar Bongo Ondimba Foundation for Peace, Science, Culture and the Environment and the Gabonese National Commission for UNESCO with the support of UNESCO and the participation of the AU. The general objective of this forum was to mobilize and unite African youth, particularly through a number of representative field structures, with a view to promoting a culture of peace in Africa. Since its creation, the “Pan-African Youth Network for the Culture of Peace” has been involved in all major initiatives involving youth organized by UNESCO, not only in the sub-region, but also at the continental level, including the now traditional youth forum, one of the institutionalized segments of the “Luanda Biennale. Pan-African Forum for Culture”.

– – – – – –

If you wish to make a comment on this article, you may write to coordinator@cpnn-world.org with the title “Comment on (name of article)” and we will put your comment on line. Because of the flood of spam, we have discontinued the direct application of comments.

Israeli General Strike Protests Netanyahu’s ‘Cabinet of Death’

. . HUMAN RIGHTS . .

An article by Jake Johnson from Common Dreams

Workers across Israel walked off the job and took to the streets on Monday to protest Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s refusal to agree to a cease-fire and hostage-release deal after Israeli forces recovered the bodies of six people who were held captive by Hamas in the Gaza Strip.

Teachers, local government employees, transit workers, and others took part in the strike, which halted departures from Israel’s largest airport, shut down universities and shopping malls, and disrupted the flow of traffic as outraged Israelis blocked roads.


Israelis gather in the center of Tel Aviv on September 2, 2024 to demand a hostage-release agreement. (Photo: Mostafa Alkharouf/Anadolu via Getty Images)

The strike was called by Histadrut, Israel’s largest trade union. Arnon Bar-David, the union’s chairman, said  ahead of the action that “this is not a matter of right or left; it is a matter of life and death.”

“All the heads of the security establishment support the deal, and it is the government’s responsibility to bring our hostages home,” he continued. “It is inconceivable that our children will not return because of narrow considerations and interests.”

Yair Lapid, Israel’s opposition leader, expressed support for the strike, saying  that “Netanyahu and the cabinet of death decided not to save” the six hostages whose bodies were recovered from Rafah. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said Sunday that Hamas fighters killed the hostages, including Israeli American Hersh Goldberg-Polin.

Hamas said in a statement  that “we hold the criminal terrorist Benjamin Netanyahu and the biased American administration responsible for the failure of the negotiations to stop the aggression against our people and to release the prisoners in an exchange.”

“We also hold him fully responsible for the lives of the prisoners who were killed by his army’s bullets,” Hamas added.

The IDF’s announcement Sunday intensified the fury that hostages’ families and much of Israeli society have directed at Netanyahu, who has repeatedly sabotaged cease-fire talks  with hardline demands in recent weeks. Israeli officials believe around 100 hostages remain in captivity in Gaza, including roughly 35 who are believed to be dead.

At least some of the hostages have been killed by Israeli forces. In April, Hamas released a brief video  in which Goldberg-Polin appealed to the Netanyahu government for a cease-fire agreement and said at least 70 hostages had been killed in IDF attacks.

(continued in right column)

Question related to this article:

How can war crimes be documented, stopped, punished and prevented?

How can a culture of peace be established in the Middle East?

(continued from left column)

B’Tselem, an Israeli advocacy organization, said in a statement  Sunday that “the six Israeli hostages whose bodies were recovered from Gaza this morning could have been saved if the Israeli government had heeded the pleas of their families and the Israeli public to reach a cease-fire and an exchange deal.”

“The Israeli government places no value on human life—whether of its Gazan subjects or of its own citizens,” the group added.

Labor unions in the United States—Israel’s main ally and weapons supplier—expressed solidarity with Israeli workers who walked off the job Monday, with American Federation of Teachers president Randi Weingarten applauding  “this action to halt Israel’s economy to send a message to the Netanyahu government to end this war.”

“We are devastated by the murder of the six innocent hostages by Hamas, young people, most of whom were at the Nova dance festival,” said Weingarten. “But it is unconscionable that Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu has refused to seal a cease-fire deal with Hamas that would bring the hostages home and end the humanitarian crisis of Gaza. We have called for an end to this war since January. In Netanyahu’s obstinance, he has refused to listen, even to his own military and security experts.”

The strike kicked off amid reports that the U.S. “has been talking to Egypt and Qatar about the contours of a final ‘take it or leave it’ deal that it plans to present to the parties in the coming weeks,” according to The Washington Post.

“Biden officials said it was not immediately clear whether the discovery of the six hostages would make it more or less likely that Israel and Hamas could come to an agreement in the coming weeks,” the Post added.

Drop Site’s Jeremy Scahill noted  Sunday that “rather than insisting on upholding what [U.S. President Joe] Biden said was Israel’s own proposal in May, the U.S. has appeased Netanyahu’s efforts to allow an indefinite presence of Israeli forces in Gaza and an open-ended campaign of military attacks.”

Update:

The chairman of Histadrut, Israel’s largest trade union, instructed workers  to return to their jobs following an order by an Israeli court to end the general strike on Monday afternoon.

(Editor’s notes:

In a related development on August 31, “in Tel Aviv, tens of thousands of demonstrators, including relatives of those held hostage in Gaza, gathered at the Hostages Square for a rally demanding their loved ones’ return and pled with the prime minister and negotiating team to reach an agreement before time runs out.”

A list of businesses affected by the general strike has been published by the Times of Israel.)

– – – – – –

If you wish to make a comment on this article, you may write to coordinator@cpnn-world.org with the title “Comment on (name of article)” and we will put your comment on line. Because of the flood of spam, we have discontinued the direct application of comments.