All posts by CPNN Coordinator

About CPNN Coordinator

Dr David Adams is the coordinator of the Culture of Peace News Network. He retired in 2001 from UNESCO where he was the Director of the Unit for the International Year for the Culture of Peace, proclaimed for the Year 2000 by the United Nations General Assembly.

Nonviolent Peaceforce: A paradigm shift?

EDUCATION FOR PEACE .

An article from the Nonviolent Peaceforce

As violent chaos overwhelms all existing approaches to civilian protection, unarmed civilian protection is gaining attention. Over the past three months, NP has given high-level presentations in Europe, the Middle East and the US.

paradigm

On February 1, Rolf Carriere, NP board member and senior advisor, spoke at a Brussels forum on Civil Society Perspectives on European Union Implementation of the 2015 UN Reviews. In noting that unarmed civilian protection (UCP) was prominently cited in two UN reviews, Mr. Carriere asserted, “UCP is ready for scaling up. There is almost no conflict where it would not be suitable for these unarmed strategies to be used, especially if the engagement is early on in the conflict cycle, more preventative.”

NP board chair Mukesh Kapila and Tiffany Easthom, NP director for the Middle East, spoke on a panel at the World Bank’s Fragility Forum in Washington DC., March 1-3, where they noted that the sum of the various efforts by international actors is clearly not adequate to today’s needs of rising toll of humanitarian disasters and violence against civilians. They stressed the need to be guided by the local communities, to utilize unarmed approaches and to challenge institutional norms.

Two weeks later, Dr. Rachel Julian of Leeds Beckett University in the UK joined Easthom in Berlin to testify before a subcommittee of the Bundestag. Based on evaluations, case studies and interviews of those involved with nine organizations providing unarmed civilian protection, Dr. Julian has found that UCP changes the behavior of armed actors, helps communities stay at home and saves lives. Ms. Easthom was impressed by the parliamentarians’ high level of knowledge and keen interest to scale up UCP. Mel Duncan followed up with a delegation of German parliamentarians when the visited New York in early April.

(Article continued in the right column)

Question for this article:

Can peace be guaranteed through nonviolent means?

(Article continued from the left column)

Chris Holt and Shannon Radsky of NP’s team in South Sudan spent a week in mid-March speaking at parallel events for the UN’s Commission on the Status of Women as well as meeting with UN officials in New York. While affirming the findings of the March 10th UN High Commissioner on Human Rights Report of extreme violence in South Sudan, they went on to detail ways that women are not only victims but also effective agents of civilian protection.

On the religious front, Easthom participated in a retreat sponsored by the World Council of Churches in Beirut where they adopted a strong theme of nonviolent approaches. And Mel will take part in a conference on nonviolence at the Vatican in mid April.

So what does this all mean? Merely a dizzying array of junkets? Or will this advocacy translate into a meaningful increase in the protection of civilians? Dr. Julian observes that a paradigm shift is underway, “One of the most dramatic shifts will have taken place when everyone realizes that, the assumption that an armed actor will not yield to anything except a weapon has been proven to be untrue.”

Together we are proving that point from the bush of South Sudan and bringing the messages to places like Bundestag of Germany.

(Thank you to Janet Hudgins, the CPNN reporter for this article.)

Landmark Vatican conference rejects just war theory, asks for encyclical on nonviolence

TOLERANCE AND SOLIDARITY .

An article by Joshua J. McElwee for the National Catholic Reporter

The participants of a first-of-its-kind Vatican conference have bluntly rejected the Catholic church’s long-held teachings on just war theory, saying they have too often been used to justify violent conflicts and the global church must reconsider Jesus’ teachings on nonviolence.
Members of a three-day event co-hosted by the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace and the international Catholic peace organization Pax Christi have also strongly called on Pope Francis to consider writing an encyclical letter, or some other “major teaching document,” reorienting the church’s teachings on violence.

vatican

There is no ‘just war,'” the some 80 participants of the conference state in an appeal they released Thursday morning.

“Too often the ‘just war theory’ has been used to endorse rather than prevent or limit war,” they continue. “Suggesting that a ‘just war’ is possible also undermines the moral imperative to develop tools and capacities for nonviolent transformation of conflict.”

“We need a new framework that is consistent with Gospel nonviolence,” say the participants, noting that Francis and his four predecessors have all spoken out against war often. “We propose that the Catholic Church develop and consider shifting to a Just Peace approach based on Gospel nonviolence.”

NCR’s sister publication Celebration offers a FREE resource guide on Pope Francis’ The Face of Mercy. Get it here.
FaceofMercy_coverSMALL.jpg
Just war theory is a tradition that uses a series of criteria to evaluate whether use of violence can be considered morally justifiable. First referred to by fourth-century bishop St. Augustine of Hippo, it was later articulated in depth by 13th-century theologian St. Thomas Aquinas and is today outlined by four conditions in the formal Catechism of the Catholic Church.

The Rome conference, held Monday through Wednesday [April 10-13], brought experts engaged in global nonviolent struggles to reconsider the theory for the first time under the aegis of the Vatican.

It comes after a number of theologians have criticized continued use of the theory in modern times, saying that both the powerful capabilities of modern weapons and evidence of the effectiveness of nonviolent campaigns make it outdated.

At a press event launching the conference’s final appeal document — given the title “An Appeal to the Catholic Church to Re-Commit to the Centrality of Gospel Nonviolence” — several of the event’s participants said the church should simply no longer teach the just war theory.

“I came a long distance for this conference, with a very clear mind that violence is outlived,” said Archbishop John Baptist Odama of Gulu, Uganda. “It is out of date for our world of today.”

“We have to sound this with a strong voice,” said the archbishop. “Any war is a destruction. There is no justice in destruction. … It is outdated.”

The Catechism currently outlines as one criteria for moral justification of war that “the use of arms must not produce evils and disorders graver than the evil to be eliminated” and notes that “the power of modern means of destruction weighs very heavily in evaluating this condition.”

Odama, who also leads Uganda’s bishops’ conference, said the conditions in the Catechism “are only given to say in reality there should be no war.”

“This is where the group was very strong,” he said, referring to the conference. “We should not give now, at this moment, reasons for war. Let us block them and promote relationships of harmony, of brother and sisterhood, rather than going for war.”

Marie Dennis, an American who serves as a co-president of Pax Christi International, said she and the conference group “believe that it is time for the church to speak another word into the global reality.”

(article continued on the right side of the page)

Question for this article

Where in the world can we find good leadership today?

Readers’ comments are invited on this question and article. See below for comments box.

(article continued from the left side of the page)

“When we look at the reality of war, when we look at the teachings of Jesus, we’re asking what is the responsibility of the church,” she said. “And it is, we believe, a responsibility to promote nonviolence.”

Dennis also said she understands that people may raise concerns in rejecting the just war theory over needing to stop unjust aggressors. Her group, she said, agrees that violent aggressors have to be stopped.

“The question is how,” said Dennis. “Our belief would be that as long as we keep saying we can do it with military force, we will not invest the creative energy, the deep thinking, the financial and human resources in creating or identifying the alternatives that actually could make a difference.”

“As long as we say that dropping bombs will solve the problem we won’t find other solutions and I think that’s feeling more and more clear to us,” he said.

The April conference on just war theory had been discussed for months and was the first cohosted by the Vatican’s pontifical council and Pax Christi, an international Catholic coalition akin to Amnesty International that maintains separate national groups in many countries.

The conference was organized around four sessions allowing participants to dialogue and share experiences with one another. The only scheduled talk at the event was given by Cardinal Peter Turkson, the head of the pontifical council, who also read a letter sent to the participants by Francis.

Among other participants were bishops from Nigeria and Japan, and leaders of the Rome-based umbrella groups for men and women religious around the world. Also taking part were a senior policy fellow at the U.S. Institute of Peace, several noted theologians, and Irish Nobel Peace Prize winner Mairead Maguire.

The group’s final appeal states succinctly: “The time has come for our Church to be a living witness and to invest far greater human and financial resources in promoting a spirituality and practice of active nonviolence.”

“In all of this, Jesus is our inspiration and model,” they state. “Neither passive nor weak, Jesus’ nonviolence was the power of love in action.”

Odama said Jesus “always asked his followers not to resort to violence in solving problems, including in his last stage of life.”

“On the cross, [Jesus] said, ‘Father forgive them because they don’t know what they’re doing,'” said the archbishop. “In this statement, he united the whole of humanity under one father.”

“He does not take violent words and violent actions,” said Odama. “That is the greatest act of teaching as to how we should handle our situations. Not violence.”

Dennis said that part of the goal in organizing the conference “was to ultimately lead to an encyclical or a process that would produce major Catholic teaching on nonviolence.”

“We haven’t run into a roadblock yet,” she said. “There are no promises.”

“What we really hope will happen is a process that will engage the Vatican and the Catholic communities around the world in exactly these questions,” said Dennis. “What can we know better about the role that nonviolence can play in shifting our world to a better place?”

Ken Butigan, a lecturer at DePaul University in Chicago and executive director of the non-profit group Pace e Bene, said: “We have gotten a green light for months that this is something that Pope Francis is excited about moving forward on.”

“We are determined to support that momentum at this historical moment,” he said. “We know Pope Francis has a vision and we’re here to support that vision.”

(Thank you to Janet Hudgins, the CPNN reporter for this article.)

Bulletin français 1 avril 2016

. . VILLES CULTURE DE PAIX . .

Il apparaît que la culture de la paix progresse de plus en plus à travers les villes selon les articles que nous avons publiés dans CPNN depuis janvier.

Au plus haut niveau, les maires de Madrid, Manuela Carmena, et de Paris, Anne Hidalgo, vont organiser un forum international contre la violence et pour l’éducation à la paix. Avec Bruxelles, ce sont leurs villes qui ont souffert le plus des attaques terroristes en Europe. Face aux États-nations qui ne donnent que des réponses militaires, ces municipalités proposent l’éducation pour la non-violence.

Alors que les États-nations continuent à fabriquer des armes nucléaires, le réseau, Maires pour la Paix, avec plus de 6.900 villes dans 161 pays, continue à donner la priorité à la lutte pour le désarmement nucléaire. Nous avons récemment publié un article d’une de leurs villes membres, Wellington, Nouvelle-Zélande.

D’autre part, le réseau,Villes internationales de paix, avec 130 villes membres dans 40 pays, a récemment annoncé une alliance avec le réseau nouvellement formé de Villes de Compassion comprennant 70 villes dans près de 50 pays qui ont affirmé la Charte pour la Compassion, promouvant la culture de la paix au niveau local.

Aux États-Unis est né un mouvement croissant de villes qui entreprennent la transformation vers une culture de la paix.

A New Haven, au Connecticut, pour la quatrième année la Commission pour la paix, un organe du gouvernement de la ville, a publié un rapport sur l’état de la culture de la paix. Le rapport identifie les priorités pour l’action de la ville. Deux de leurs priorités ont été présentées dans les articles récents de CPNN: la justice réparatrice dans les écoles, et l’accueil des réfugiés.

La ville de Ashland, en Oregon, a récemment établi une Commission Culture de la Paix dont l’un de leurs travaux est la rédaction d’un rapport annuel sur l’état de la culture de la paix dans leur ville. D’autres tâches incluent la formation des ambassadeurs de la paix, l’éducation à la paix dans les écoles, un répertoire des ressources communautaires qui favorisent une culture de la paix, et un monument contenant la Flamme de la paix mondiale.

Des organisations de la société civile à Wilmington, au Delaware, développent une “vision stratégique, un plan et un document des ressources qui apportera la paix à Wilmington. Le plan traitera des actions nécessaires pour transformer une culture de violence en une culture de la paix. Le plan comprendra l’apport des groupes civiques, la ville, l’État, les églises, les étudiants, les personnes âgées, et le grand public “.

Une nouvelle initiative a pour but de créer un réseau des “villes non-violentes,” sur le modèle d’une initiative à Carbondale, en Illinois. Ses objectifs sont similaires à ceux de New Haven, Ashland et Wilmington: “Villes non-violentes travaillera à mettre fin au racisme, à la pauvreté, au vagabondage, à la violence sous toutes ses formes et à tous les niveaux, à démanteler la ségrégation du logement et à poursuivre l’intégration raciale, sociale et économique.

Il s’agit aussi de “mettre fin aux violences policières en institutionnalisant la nonviolence au sein de la police, d’organiser en enseignement qui stoppe la violence domestique et developpe la nonviolence envers tous les enfants, de travailler pour mettre fin à la violence des bandes et enseigner la nonviolence à leurs membres.”

Toujours dans cette initiative, elle veut “enseigner la nonviolence dans toutes les écoles; poursuivre la nonviolence dans les programmes et les politiques d’immigration; amener les dirigeants et les communautés religieuses à promouvoir la nonviolence et la vision d’une ville nouvelle, nonviolente; réformer les prisons afin qu’elles soient moins violentes en éduquant les gardiens et les prisonniers dans la nonviolence.”

Enfin, l’initiative propose de “passer de la justice rétributive à la justice réparatrice dans l’ensemble du système de justice pénale; d’arrêter la destruction locale de l’environnement, de stopper le changement climatique, et le racisme environnemental; de poursuivre le progrès énergetique concernant l’eau propre, les énergies éolienne et solaire, avec une communauté verte à 100 pour cent, et en général, faire tout ce qui est possible pour aider la communauté locale à devenir plus solidaire, plus juste, plus accueillante, et, donc, d’avantage nonviolente.”

Les pratiques avancées par la culture des villes de paix comprennent la médiation, la justice réparatrice et la budgétisation participative, comme décrit dans les articles de CPNN précédents.

      

PARTICIPATION DÉMOCRATIQUE

Ashland

USA: Working on creating a culture of peace in Ashland

ÉQUALITÉ HOMMES/FEMMES

csw unionists

Les délégations syndicales commencent leur travail lors de la 60e Session de la Commission de la condition de la femme des Nations Unies

DISARMAMENT ET SECURITÉ

trident

United Kingdom: Thousands call for Britain’s nuclear deterrent Trident to be scrapped

DROITS DE L’HOMME

amnesty

2015: When Global Governments Trampled Human Rights in Name of National Security

TOLERANCE ET SOLIDARITÉ

rising

GLOBAL YOUTH RISING: Empowering passionate activists and peace workers from around the world– JULY 2016

DÉVELOPPEMENT DURABLE

einstein
Les Lauréats Sénégalais du “Next Einstein Forum” exposent les résultats de leurs travaux scientifiques

LIBERTÉ DE L’INFORMATION

guantanomo

Guantanamo could be turned from a war facility to a peace park

ÉDUCATION POUR LA PAIX

patrir
Romania: Systemic Peacebuilding, Conflict Transformation & Post-War Recovery and Reconciliation

Boletín español: el 01 de abril 2016

. CIUDADES DE CULTURA DE PAZ .

La cultura de paz se promueve cada vez más a nivel municipal de acuerdo a los artículos que hemos publicado este año en CPNN.

Al más alto nivel, la alcaldesa de Madrid, Manuela Carmena, y la alcaldesa de París, Anne Hidalgo, están planeando un foro internacional contra la violencia y para la educación para la paz. Junto con Bruselas, esas ciudades han sufrido los más terribles ataques terroristas en Europa. Mientras los estados nacionales buscan respuestas militares, las alcaldesas proponen la educación para la no violencia.

Mientras que los estados nacionales siguen fabricando armas nucleares, la red de Alcaldes por la Paz, con más de 6.900 ciudades en 161 países, sigue dando prioridad a la lucha por el desarme nuclear. Recientemente hemos publicado un artículo de una de sus ciudades miembros, Wellington, Nueva Zelanda.

La red de Ciudades Internacionales de Paz, con 130 ciudades miembros en 40 países, ha anunciado recientemente una alianza con la nueva red de Ciudades Compasivos que incluye 70 ciudades en casi 50 países que han afirmado la Carta por la Compasión, que promueve una cultura de paz al nivel local.

En los Estados Unidos hay un movimiento creciente de ciudades que llevan a cabo la transformación hacia una cultura de paz.

En New Haven, Connecticut, por cuarto año la Comisión de Paz, un órgano gubernamental de la ciudad, emitió un informe sobre la situación de la cultura de paz. El informe identifica las prioridades para la acción en la ciudad. Dos de sus prioridades aparecieron en los últimos artículos de CPNN: la justicia restaurativa en las escuelas, y la acogida de los refugiados.

La ciudad de Ashland, Oregon, estableció recientemente una Comisión de Cultura de Paz, y entre sus tareas está también un informe anual sobre la situación la cultura de paz en su ciudad. Otras tareas incluyen la capacitación de los embajadores de la paz, educación para la paz en las escuelas, un directorio de recursos comunitarios que promueven una cultura de paz, y un monumento con la Llama de la Paz Mundial.

Las organizaciones de la sociedad civil en Wilmington, Delaware, están desarrollando una “visión estratégica, un plan y un documento de los recursos que traerá la paz a Wilmington. El plan se ocupará de las acciones necesarias para transformar la cultura de violencia en cultura de paz. El plan incluirá el aporte de grupos cívicos, gobiernos de la ciudad y del estado, las iglesias, estudiantes, ancianos, y el público en general”.
Una nueva iniciativa tiene como objetivo crear una red de ciudades “no violentas”, basado en el modelo de una iniciativa en Carbondale, Illinois. Sus objetivos son similares a los de New Haven, Ashland y Wilmington: “Las ciudades sin violencia trabajarían para acabar con el racismo, la pobreza, la falta de vivienda, y la violencia en todos los niveles y en todas sus formas; desmantelar la segregación de viviendas y llevar a cabo la integración racial, social y económica; poner fin a la violencia policial; organizarse para poner fin a la violencia doméstica y enseñar la no violencia entre los cónyuges, y la no violencia hacia todos los niños, el trabajo para poner fin a la violencia de pandilla y enseñar la no violencia a sus miembros; enseñar la no violencia en todas las escuelas; ejecutar programas y políticas de inmigración menos violentas; asegurar que los líderes religiosos y comunitarios promuevan la visión de una ciudad no violenta; reformar las cárceles y prisiones locales para que sean menos violentos y educar a los guardias y detenidos en la no violencia; pasar de la justicia retributiva a la justicia restaurativa en todo el sistema de justicia penal; afrontar la destrucción del medio ambiente, el cambio climático, y el racismo ambiental, perseguir agua limpia, energía solar y eólica, y una comunidad un 100 por ciento verde; y, en general, hacer todo lo posible para ayudar a su comunidad local ser más desarmada, más reconciliada, más justa, más acogedora, más inclusiva y más no violenta “.

Entre las prácticas promovidas por las ciudades de cultura de paz están la mediación, la justicia restaurativa y los presupuestos participativos, tal como se publicó en los artículos anteriores de CPNN.

      

PARTICIPACIÓN DEMOCRATICA

Mexico
La Ciudad de México: Aplicarán sistema de mediación en las 16 delegaciones

IGUALDAD HOMBRES/MUJERES

csw unionists

Education International and other Global Union Federation delegations begin their work at the 60th Session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women

DESARME Y SEGURIDAD

trident

United Kingdom: Thousands call for Britain’s nuclear deterrent Trident to be scrapped

DERECHOS HUMANOS

amnesty

2015: When Global Governments Trampled Human Rights in Name of National Security

TOLERANCIA Y SOLIDARIDAD

rising

GLOBAL YOUTH RISING: Empowering passionate activists and peace workers from around the world– JULY 2016

DESAROLLO SUSTENTABLE

Fishing

Fishing ban in remote Pacific waters is working, report finds

LIBERTAD DE INFORMACIÓN

guantanomo

Guantanamo could be turned from a war facility to a peace park

EDUCACIÓN PARA PAZ

patrir
Romania: Systemic Peacebuilding, Conflict Transformation & Post-War Recovery and Reconciliation

English bulletin April 1, 2016

. . CULTURE OF PEACE CITIES . .

The culture of peace is increasingly promoted at the level of the city according to the articles we have been publishing so far this year in CPNN.

At the highest level, the mayor of Madrid, Manuela Carmena, and the mayor of Paris, Anne Hidalgo, are planning to hold an international forum against violence and for peace education. Along with Brussels, their cities have suffered the most from terrorist attacks in Europe. While nation states promote military responses, they propose education for non-violence.

While nation states continue to make nuclear weapons, the network of Mayors for Peace, with over 6,900 cities in 161 countries, continues to prioritize the struggle for nuclear disarmament. We recently published an article from one of their member cities, Wellington, New Zealand.

The network of International Cities of Peace, with 130 member cities in 40 countries, has recently announced an alliance with the newly formed network of Compassionate Cities that includes 70 cities in almost 50 countries that have affirmed the Charter for Compassion, which promotes a culture of peace at the local level.

In the United States there is a growing movement of cities that undertake the transformation to a culture of peace.

In New Haven, Connecticut, this is the fourth year that the City Peace Commission, an organ of city government, has published a report on The State of the Culture of Peace in New Haven. The report identifies priorities for action by the city. Two of their priorities have been featured in recent CPNN articles: restorative justice in the schools, and welcoming refugees.

The city of Ashland, Oregon, has recently established an official City Culture of Peace Commission, and among its tasks is a similar annual report on the state of the culture of peace in their city. Other tasks include the training of peace ambassadors, peace education in schools, a directory of community resources that promote a culture of peace, and a monument containing the World Peace Flame.

Civil society organizations in Wilmington, Delaware, are developing a “strategic vision, plan and resource document that will bring peace to Wilmington. The plan will deal with the actions needed to transform a culture of violence to a culture of peace. The plan would include input from civic groups, city and state governments and agencies, churches, students, the elderly, and general public.”

A new initiative aims to create a network of Nonviolent Cities, modeled after an initiative in Carbondale, Illinois. Its goals are similar to those of New Haven, Ashland and Wilmington: “Nonviolent cities would work to end racism, poverty, homelessness, and violence at every level and in every form; dismantle housing segregation and pursue racial, social and economic integration; end police violence and institutionalize police nonviolence; organize to end domestic violence and teach nonviolence between spouses, and nonviolence toward all children; work to end gang violence and teach nonviolence to gang members; teach nonviolence in every school; pursue more nonviolent immigration programs and policies; get religious leaders and communities to promote nonviolence and the vision of a new nonviolent city; reform local jails and prisons so they are more nonviolent and educate guards and prisoners in nonviolence; move from retributive to restorative justice in the entire criminal justice system; address local environmental destruction, climate change, and environmental racism, pursue clean water, solar and wind power, and a 100 percent green community; and in general, do everything possible to help their local community become more disarmed, more reconciled, more just, more welcoming, more inclusive, and more nonviolent.”

The practices promoted by culture of peace cities include mediation, restorative justice and participative budgeting, as described in previous CPNN articles.

      

DEMOCRATIC PARTICIPATION

Ashland

USA: Working on creating a culture of peace in Ashland

WOMEN’S EQUALITY

csw unionists

Education International and other Global Union Federation delegations begin their work at the 60th Session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women

DISARMAMENT AND SECURITY

trident

United Kingdom: Thousands call for Britain’s nuclear deterrent Trident to be scrapped

HUMAN RIGHTS

amnesty

2015: When Global Governments Trampled Human Rights in Name of National Security

TOLERANCE AND SOLIDARITY

rising

GLOBAL YOUTH RISING: Empowering passionate activists and peace workers from around the world– JULY 2016

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Fishing

Fishing ban in remote Pacific waters is working, report finds

FREE FLOW OF INFORMATION

guantanomo

Guantanamo could be turned from a war facility to a peace park

EDUCATION FOR PEACE

patrir
Romania: Systemic Peacebuilding, Conflict Transformation & Post-War Recovery and Reconciliation

Mexico City: A system of mediation to be applied in all 16 delegations

. . DEMOCRATIC PARTICIPATION . .

An article by Lemic Madrid, Azteca Noticias

In Mexico City a system of mediation will be applied as an alternative means to resolve conflicts in the communities of the 16 delegations; With this action, citizens in the capital city will be able to reach agreement with authorities to resolve issues of security, services and urban infrastructure.

Mexico
City Prosecutor Rodolfo Ríos Garza

The Superior Court of Justice and the Attorney General of the capital will promote the training of mediators who will work to ensure access to justice and the rights of all parties in conflict, seeking a satisfactory solution for the benefit of the community.

“The major objective of community mediation is to consider all people as citizens with rational capacity to voluntarily settle their conflicts, so that they do not need to reach the courts … They will be supported by a community mediator who legitimizes the process,” according to the President of the Capital City Court of Justice, Edgar Elias Azar.

During his participation in the signing of the agreement to implement the system in the 16 delegations of the capital, he said that in criminal matters, this strategy has generated savings of resources and time by establishing a dialogue between the conflicting parties.

As for the city prosecutor, Rodolfo Rios Garza, he said the mediation system has generated dividends by ensuring compensation for damage and by shortening the time required for the settlement of a conflict by means of a dialogue between the two sides.

“This can be seen through the activity carried out by mediation units in law enforcement, which, from January 2015 to February 2016, recorded 7,326 processes, leading to the signing of 1,871 agreements and 860 agreements with reparations, thus achieving the proper settlement of disputes between the parties involved in a conflict of criminal content,” said the city prosecutor, Rodolfo Rios Garza. He indicated that these results led to the decision to extend mediation to other areas of public life.

(Click here for a Spanish version of this article)

Question related to this article:

La Ciudad de México: Aplicarán sistema de mediación en las 16 delegaciones

. . PARTICIPACIÓN DEMOCRATICA . .

Un artículo de Lemic Madrid, Azteca Noticias

En la Ciudad de México se aplicará el sistema de mediación, como un medio alternativo para resolver conflictos en las comunidades de las 16 delegaciones; con esta acción, los capitalinos tendrán la posibilidad de llegar a un acuerdo con las autoridades administrativas para resolver temas de seguridad, servicios o infraestructura urbana.

Mexico
Procurador Rodolfo Ríos Garza

El Tribunal Superior de Justicia y la Procuraduría General de Justicia de la capital, ayudarán en la capacitación y formación de los mediadores que trabajarán para garantizar el acceso a la justicia y los derechos de las partes en conflicto, buscando una solución satisfactoria en beneficio de la comunidad.

“La mediación comunitaria tiene un objetivo principal, de considerar a todas las personas como ciudadanos y ciudadanas con capacidad racional para dirimir voluntariamente sus conflictos, que no lleguen a los tribunales…Que sean ellas mismas con el apoyo de un mediador comunitario que legitime su pacto, las que encuentren la solución pactada y consensuada, frente al desencuentro del conflicto”, dijo el presidente del Tribunal de Justicia capitalino, Edgar Elías Azar.

Durante su participación en la firma del acuerdo para implementar dicho sistema, en las 16 delegaciones de la capital, señaló que en el ámbito penal, esta estrategia ha generado ahorro de recursos y tiempo para los usuarios al establecer un dialogó entre las partes en conflicto.

Al respecto el procurador capitalino, Rodolfo Ríos Garza, señaló que el sistema de mediación ha generado buenos dividendos al garantizar la reparación del daño y acortar la solución de un conflicto, con un dialogo entre ambas partes.

“Esto puede observarse a través de la actividad que realizan las unidades de mediación en procuración de justicia, las cuales, de enero de 2015 a febrero de 2016, iniciaron 7,326 expedientes; de los que se han derivado la suscripción de 1,871 convenios y 860 acuerdos reparatorios, lográndose así la adecuada solución de controversias entre las partes implicadas en un conflicto de contenido penal”, dijo el procurador capitalino, Rodolfo Ríos Garza.

Durante su participación en la firma del acuerdo para aplicar el sistema de mediación en las 16 demarcaciones de la capital, el abogado de la ciudad señaló que estos resultados fueron los que llevaron a proyectar los beneficios de esta estrategia a otros ámbitos de la vida pública.

( Clickear aquí para la version inglês)

Pregunta(s) relacionada(s) al artículo

Progress in Participatory Budgeting

. .DEMOCRATIC PARTICIPATION. .

Based on information on the website of the Participatory Budgeting Project

Participatory budgeting (PB) is a different way to manage public money, and to engage people in government. It is a democratic process in which community members directly decide how to spend part of a public budget. The process was first developed in Brazil in 1989, and there are now over 1,500 participatory budgets around the world. Most of these are at the city level, for the municipal budget.

participative budgeting
Video: Real money, real power: participatory budgeting

Though each experience is different, most follow a similar basic process: residents brainstorm spending ideas, volunteer budget delegates develop proposals based on these ideas, residents vote on proposals, and the government implements the top projects. For example, if community members identify recreation spaces as a priority, their delegates might develop a proposal for basketball court renovations. The residents would then vote on this and other proposals, and if they approve the basketball court, the city pays to renovate it.

There are so many cities and institutions implementing Participatory Budgeting that it is almost impossible to keep track of them all. However, the Participatory Budgeting Project presents a map showing twenty of the most developed and interesting PB processes in North America, Latin America and Europe that illustrate the diversity of PB models. Readers can click on the markers or view the tables underneath the map to see basic information about each process.

Here are seven of the twenty examples.

Brazil: Porto Alegre, with nearly 1.5 million residents, was the first city to launch a full PB process, in 1989. Since then, up to 50,000 residents have turned out each year to decide how to spend as much as 20% of the city’s annual budget. Participants attend a series of local assemblies, and after months of discussions budget delegates deliver a participatory budget to the city for implementation.

(Article continued in right column)

Questions for this article:

Participatory budgeting, How does it work?

(Article continued from left column)

Brazil: Belo Horizonte, population 2.5 million, has had a district-level PB since 1993, a Housing PB since 1996, and a digital PB (e-PB) since 2006. Through both local assemblies and online voting, residents allocate over $50 million per year.

Argentina: Rosario’s PB consists of an annual cycle in which over 87,000 city residents decide how to allocate around $9 million of the city budget. In this city of 1 million people, residents discuss spending ideas at neighborhood assemblies, elected delegates develop full budget proposals, and then residents vote on the proposals at another round of voting assemblies. The funds can be spent on both capital projects and services or programs.

USA: In 2009, PBP and Chicago alderman Joe Moore launched the first PB process in the U.S., in the city’s 49th Ward. In the current process, residents of three Wards decide each year how to spend $3 million of taxpayer money.

USA: New York City is host to the largest PB in the U.S. in terms of participants and budget amount. First introduced in 4 council districts in 2011, the annual PBNYC process now spans 24 Council Districts and lets residents directly decided how to spend $25 million in capital discretionary funds. 

Canada: Since 2001, Toronto’s public housing authority has engaged tenants in allocating $5 to $9 million of capital funding per year. Tenants identify local infrastructure priorities in building meetings, then budget delegates from each building meet to vote for which priorities receive funding.

Spain: Seville (pop. 700,000) is the largest European city to implement PB. From 2004-2013, residents decided on roughly 50% of local spending for their city districts, for capital projects and programs. They submitted project proposals online or in neighborhood assemblies, and after a series of meetings, locally elected budget delegates delivered the participatory budget to city hall for implementation.

USA: Working on creating a culture of peace in Ashland

. .DEMOCRATIC PARTICIPATION. .

An article by David Wick in the Ashland Daily Tidings (reprinted according to Creative Commons)

    “My experience and research have convinced me that the world is on the verge of the greatest change in human history: The transition from the culture of war that we have had for tens of thousands of years to a new culture,” and that new development, states UNESCO Director David Adams, “is a culture of peace.”

A 1999 United Nation’s Culture of Peace resolution called for a transformation from a culture of war and violence to one of peace. Aligned with this and Margaret Mead’s notion that it’s only been small groups of thoughtful committed citizens that have changed the world, a group of eight inspired local thinkers collaborated for two years before creating a Culture of Peace Proclamation with the Ashland City Council in March 2015.

Ashland
Click on photo to enlarge

The city’s proclamation, unanimously adopted by the council, says “(we) strongly encourage residents to work toward development of a Culture of Peace community, and pledge to lend appropriate encouragement and support to that effort.”

Soon an independent, community and citizen-based Ashland Culture of Peace Commission was created. Commission members were chosen to represent many aspects of Ashland’s culture: education, business, the arts, science, environment, religion, law and habitat. An active community support team was also formed. On Sept. 21, 2015, the UN International Day of Peace, the Ashland Culture of Peace Commission was launched in a community-wide celebration.

The commission and the community support team’s first actions have been to define the Ashland Culture of Peace as a community-wide movement dedicated to transforming our attitudes, behaviors, and institutions into ones that foster harmonious relationships with each other and the natural world.

Initial focus areas being developed are:

1. The Peace Ambassador Program — Training volunteers to be a positive presence in our community and on our streets, engaging in person-to-person dialogues and arranging peace forums on topics important to our community.

2. Peace Education — Offering exciting, skill-based and peace-focused learning experiences to schools in the Ashland School District.

(Article continued in right column)

Questions for this article:

How can culture of peace be developed at the municipal level?

(Article continued from left column)

3. Community Resource Directory — Identifying, listing, and dialoguing with organizations and people in our community who are already contributing or want to contribute to a culture of peace for Ashland.

4. World Peace Flame Monument — Establishing the venue and financial support for Ashland to be the 12th site in the world for the World Peace Flame, a symbol of peace, unity, freedom and celebration that will draw visitors from around the world.

5. State of the Culture of Peace in Ashland Report — Writing an annual report that will be presented to the community and City Council to provide a view into how we are doing in co-creating a Culture of Peace in Ashland.

Cities are the real societal structural level where a Culture of Peace can take root. The individual person is always the essential component for building peace through his or her daily choices, but it is the city that has the reach, authority, responsibility and influence to set the positive tone and direction for so many. When the City Council and Mayor adopted the Culture of Peace Proclamation, they strongly encouraged residents “to work toward development of a Culture of Peace community” and pledged “to lend appropriate encouragement and support to that effort.”

With our unique approach, Ashland has the opportunity to become a model of this new culture for cities around the world. It is about shifting mindset and behavior in all aspects of our societies to embrace humanity’s interconnectedness as we move from force to reason, from discord and violence to dialogue and peace-building. For sustained change there must be a larger context, a vision that inspires and unifies citizens to move forward. This vision has launched the Ashland Culture of Peace.

This is the first of a regular series of articles by the ACPC on various aspects of creating a culture of peace, both here and elsewhere. Next time we’ll address the question, “What is a Culture of Peace?”

Current commissioners include: Amy Blossom, Ben Morgen, Bert Etling, Bill Kauth, Catherine McKiblin, David Wick, Eric Sirotkin, Greeley Wells, Jack Gibbs, Jeff Golden, Joanne Lescher, Joe Charter, Norma Burton, Pam Marsh, Patricia Sempowich, Richard Schaeff, Tighe O’Meara and Will Sears. The original developers included some of the current commissioners, plus Elinor Berman, Irene Kai and Kathleen Gamer.

Contact David Wick via email at ashlandcpc@gmail.com, or drop by the ACPC office at 33 First St., Suite 1, Ashland. The commission’s website is at www.ashlandcpc.org.

USA: Kids4Peace Boston summer programs

EDUCATION FOR PEACE .

Excerpts from website of Kids4Peace Boston

Each year, Kids4Peace Boston works with Muslim, Jewish & Christian youth from Boston, Israel, Palestine, and the United States. Among peace education efforts, Kids4Peace is unique in three ways:

kids4peace

1) We begin with 12 year olds, engaging their natural openness to live, learn, play, and make friends with others different from themselves. Because the children are young, their families also become involved in the program and get to know one another.

2) We focus on faith, getting close to what matters most in many people’s lives. We highlight our common heritage as children of Abraham and pay attention to each tradition’s impulse toward peace and justice.

3) We maintain and nourish the relationships made in this initial encounter of children and their families so that these young people become effective interfaith peace leaders by the time they graduate from high school.

We believe that it is our obligation to teach our children to be peacemakers, leading by our own example and learning from young people’s fresh perspectives on how to live together in friendship and peace.

SUMMER CAMP FOR 6th & 7th GRADERS

Kids4Peace Boston is looking for Muslim, Jewish, and Christian 6th and 7th graders to join us for 8 days of summer camp activities (swimming, boating, sports, hiking, camp fires, arts and crafts and more) on the shores of a crystal-clear lake in the mountains of New Hampshire

Who? We are looking for participants who live in the greater Boston area and are in sixth or seventh grade during the 2015-2016 school year. Kids4Peace campers are open-minded, like to try new experiences and make new friends, and are eager to share about their lives, cultures, and religious traditions.

When? July 31 – August 7, 2016 at Camp Merrowvista in Center Tuftonboro, NH

For additional questions, email info@kids4peaceboston.org

2016 SUMMER PROGRAMS – 8th GRADE

Service Learning Program in New Haven, CT Monday, July 25 – Tuesday, August 2, 2016

8th graders, with peers from North America and the Middle East (including Israelis, Palestinians, and Syrian, Iraqi, and Afghan refugees), will explore interfaith citizenship, identity, communication, leadership, and peace by participating in a nine-day service-learning program led by Jerusalem Peacebuilders (a K4PB partner). Activities will include: dialogues, sports, workshops, presentations at local faith communities and field trips to the United Nations HQ, the 9/11 Museum at Ground Zero in New York City, and historic Mystic Seaport and Aquarium.

Click here for more information and an application:

2016 SUMMER PROGRAMS – 9th & 10th GRADES

Kids4Peace International Global Institute in Washington, DC Wednesday, July 27 – Monday, August 8, 2016

9th and 10th graders will join their peers from Kids4Peace Jerusalem and from other K4P chapters in America to learn about social change movements, gain skills in advocacy and organizing, and interact with public policy and diplomatic leaders. They will return to Boston with a few of their Israeli and Palestinian friends to implement their new skills through an interfaith community action project.

For more information and an application: www.k4p.org/summer2016/.

(Thank you to Norma Shakun for proposing this article to CPNN.)

Questions for this article: