All posts by CPNN Coordinator

About CPNN Coordinator

Dr David Adams is the coordinator of the Culture of Peace News Network. He retired in 2001 from UNESCO where he was the Director of the Unit for the International Year for the Culture of Peace, proclaimed for the Year 2000 by the United Nations General Assembly.

The World March for Peace and Nonviolence: What is its history and its effects?

The history of the World March for Peace and Nonviolence goes back to the 2009 when it started from Wellington (New Zealand) on October 2, 2009, and arrived in Punta de Vacas (Argentina) on January 2, 2010, after travelling 200 cities in 97 countries promoting peace and nonviolence (in particular, nuclear disarmament). See article in CPNN at that time.

From the beginning, Pressenza has served as its media agency, and over the years CPNN has carried their articles on the second and third world marches that took place in 2019 and 2024, as listed below.

Here are the CPNN articles on this subject:

Team of the Third World March for Peace and NonViolence entered Nepal

The Third World March for Peace and Nonviolence Takes Its First Steps in Africa

Mexico supports the launch of the Third World March for Peace and Nonviolence

Start of the 3rd World March for Peace and Nonviolence: A global call for unity

2 October 2023: 3rd World March for Peace and Nonviolence officially launched in the Spanish Congress of Deputies

The 2nd World March in Latin America with its message of Peace and Nonviolence

Launch of the Second World March for Peace and Nonviolence

2nd Walk for the Culture of Peace in Cotia, Brazil, receives support from the World March for Peace and Nonviolence

The Americas are preparing for the second World March for Peace and Nonviolence

Launch of the 2nd World March for Peace and Nonviolence at the 2nd World Forum of Peace Cities in Madrid

The World Starts the 2009 New Year with a Call for Peace

Team of the Third World March for Peace and NonViolence entered Nepal

DISARMAMENT & SECURITY .

An article by Tulsi Sigdel for Pressenza

A corps of the ‘3rd World March for Peace Team’ entered Nepal under the lead of Rafael de la Rubia, a great humanist from Spain, accompanied by prominent Humanist Peace Volunteers from UK, Italy, Australia, India and Bangladesh.

(article continued in right column)

(Click here for the article in French or click here for the article in Spanish.)

Question for this article:

The World March for Peace and Nonviolence: What is its history and its effects?

(article continued from left column)

The Humanist Team of Nepal joined the international champions of peace and began their march yesterday from the cultural city of Tokha, in Kathmandu, where they were received by municipal officials in their facilities.

There, the local authorities handed over a “Token of Love” to the group of visitors as a sign of support and appreciation for the message they are carrying. In reciprocity, the activists gave the municipal officials documents on the meaning of this worldwide action. Finally, a march was held through the streets.

The four-day march will continue today at Bouddha, TU-Kirtipur, Budhanilkantha and finally to Banepa and Dhulikhel cities. Then, the activists will cross to Pakistan, Sri Lanka and India.
– – – – – –

If you wish to make a comment on this article, you may write to coordinator@cpnn-world.org with the title “Comment on (name of article)” and we will put your comment on line. Because of the flood of spam, we have discontinued the direct application of comments.

The Third World March for Peace and Nonviolence Takes Its First Steps in Africa

DISARMAMENT & SECURITY .

An article from Pressenza (translation by CPNN)

Under the slogan “For Peace and Nonviolence”, the Third World March for Peace and Nonviolence reached Tangier, where the Seventh Humanist Forum was held from 27 to 30 November 2024, organised by the Humanist Embassy. The Forum is an international platform that brings together humanist activists from around the world to exchange ideas and strengthen efforts to build a world of peace and nonviolence.

Key Events and Themes

Participants: Humanist Embassy – World Without Wars and Without Violence – Convergence of Cultures – Humanist Association for Peace and Education in Nonviolence.

The Forum featured a series of cultural sessions and workshops focusing on the following issues:

1. Promoting the values ​​of peace and coexistence among peoples,

2. Raising awareness of the dangers of violence and promoting a culture of peace and non-violence,

3. Exchanging humanist experiences and practices in the field of peacebuilding and non-violence.

(article continued in right column)

(Click here for the original article in French.)

Question for this article:

The World March for Peace and Nonviolence: What is its history and its effects?

(article continued from left column)

International Presence

The Forum attracted more than 250 participants, including a foreign delegation of 30 humanist activists from ten countries, giving the event an international dimension and allowing the exchange of knowledge and experiences between participants from diverse cultural and geographical backgrounds.

Tangier hosted the seventh edition of the Humanist Forum

The launch of the 7th Forum in Tangier was characterized by a large and diverse audience, with the opening of the event serving as a pivotal platform for the exchange of ideas and visions on peace and non-violence. The opening session was characterized by inspiring presentations and interventions that highlighted the multiple aspects of these humanist issues by the national and international representatives of the Humanist Embassy.

The presentations were intellectually rich and culturally diverse, with the speakers sharing their personal experiences and experiences in order to promote dialogue and understanding between different cultures. The forum also allowed participants to interact with the speakers, which made the discussions more lively and enriching

Participants expressed their satisfaction with this unique event that aims to create a global platform bringing together activists, thinkers and decision-makers to share successful experiences in promoting the values ​​of peace and tolerance. The forum continued with roundtable discussions and workshops highlighting practical solutions to the challenges facing the world today in the areas of non-violence and sustainable development.

Welcoming the World March for Peace and Nonviolence

The Forum was marked by the hosting of the World March, it was organized by World Without War and Nonviolence. The march left Costa Rica on October 2, 2024 and arrived in Morocco through the gateway to Africa, Tangier, on November 27, 2024. The event was an opportunity to highlight the importance of international cooperation to promote the values ​​of peace, especially since the march will continue its journey to African countries in order to convey its message to a greater number of people.

Thus, the Forum is part of the World March, aimed at establishing a culture of peace. It coincides with the launch of the third World March, thus strengthening the vision of the Forum while expanding its impact.
– – – – – –

If you wish to make a comment on this article, you may write to coordinator@cpnn-world.org with the title “Comment on (name of article)” and we will put your comment on line. Because of the flood of spam, we have discontinued the direct application of comments.

Women of Côte d’Ivoire commit to the Culture of Peace: more than 5,000 women expected at the Palais des Sports on December 21

. WOMEN’S EQUALITY .

An article from Abidjan.net (translation by CPNN)

Peace will be celebrated on Saturday, December 21, 2024, by more than 5,000 women, at the Palais des sports in Abidjan-Treichville, an initiative of the Caucus of Women of Côte d’Ivoire for Peace. MP [Parliamentarian] Mariam Traoré, President of the Organizing Committee of this gathering made the announcment on Tuesday, December 10, during a press conference at the Maison de la Presse in Abidjan-Plateau.

She explained that it is a gathering of women “from the institutions of the Republic, elected officials, women from public and private administration, women economic operators around the theme of peace”, specifying that the meeting is intended to be an apolitical activity.

In her speech, Mariam Traoré insisted on the importance of peace for women. “The women of Côte d’Ivoire want peace to be sustained. Especially as the upcoming elections approach, they want to fully play their part by calling on all actors in our society to make the defense of peace an absolute priority”, she insisted.

(Article continued in right column)

(Click here for the original in French.)

Questions for this article

Can the women of Africa lead the continent to peace?

(Article continued from left column)

According to the speaker, the Caucus will also take this opportunity to highlight the great contribution of President Alassane Ouattara in making decisions adapted to the needs of promoting women and the population in general. “We want to thank him for the peace and stability restored in our country. To mark this moment, we will release doves of peace,” she stressed.

“We, the women of Côte d’Ivoire, want peace and we are ready to work with all parties to achieve it,” assured the Tengrela MP. In the same vein, Mariam Traoré stressed the importance of peace, which she considers the most precious state to which all peoples of the world aspire. “For several years, our country has been living in tranquility and security; this contributes to ensuring the harmonious development of our nation and our activities,” she rejoiced.

The MP also urged Ivorians to preserve this stability, particularly as the next elections approach. “We must all work, each at our own level, to protect this peace that our country has taken so long to find.”

The ceremony is under the high patronage of Adama Tounkara, Mediator of the Republic, and under the patronage of Adama Bictogo, President of the National Assembly and the co-sponsorship of Henriette Dagri Diabaté.

– – – – – –

If you wish to make a comment on this article, you may write to coordinator@cpnn-world.org with the title “Comment on (name of article)” and we will put your comment on line. Because of the flood of spam, we have discontinued the direct application of comments.

Third edition of dialogue on youth, peace, security in Africa opens in Bujumbura, Burundi

DISARMAMENT & SECURITY .

An article from the Nile Post

The third edition of the youth, peace and security in Africa dialogue organized by the African Union has opened in Bujumbura, Burundi.

The objective of the dialogue is to promote the youth peace and security agenda through advocacy and participation of young women and men across the Continent to meaningfully contribute to the implementation of the Youth, Peace, and Security (YPS) Agenda in Africa.

The dialogue running under the theme, ‘Empowering African Youth for Peace: Education and Enhanced Coordination as a Catalyst for the Implementation of the YPS Agenda’ is being held at the at the Kiriri Presidential Palace and President  Évariste Ndayishimiye who is also the African Union champion of the YPS agenda is among the participants.

With more than 60% of Africa’s population under the age of 25, the youth are a critical force for shaping Africa’s future.

(article continued in right column)

(Click here for an article on this subject in French.)

Question for this article:

Can the African Union help bring a culture of peace to Africa?

(article continued from left column)

However, the continent still faces challenges in peace and security, including armed conflicts, political instability, and the rise of extremist groups, which disproportionately impact youth, women, and other vulnerable populations.

The dialogue in Bujumbura has brought together key stakeholders to assess progress, identify challenges, and explore strategies for mainstreaming peace education in school curriculums and mobilizing resources for YPS initiatives.

Over 1,200 participants, including policymakers, young leaders, and representatives of international institutions are attending.

The third edition of the dialogue has brought together key stakeholders in the implementation of the youth, peace and security agenda at the continental, regional and member states levels in order to assess the progress made so far, the challenges and opportunities for enhanced coordination, collaboration and complementarity.

On the other hand, the dialogue seeks to engage the participants in reflecting on effective ways to promote peace education in Africa.

(Editor’s note: Further information is available on the Twitter page of the African Union Youth Ambassadors for Peace.

– – – – – –

If you wish to make a comment on this article, you may write to coordinator@cpnn-world.org with the title “Comment on (name of article)” and we will put your comment on line. Because of the flood of spam, we have discontinued the direct application of comments.

Mexico: Jalisco SPPC launches training in Culture of Peace for the reconstruction of the social fabric

… EDUCATION FOR PEACE …

An article from the Gobierno del Estado de Jalisco (translation by CPNN)

The Government of Jalisco through the Secretariat of Planning and Citizen Participation (SPPC), has began the training process in Culture of Peace for the reconstruction of the social fabric, in order to promote communities of care in the municipalities of the State.

The strategy “Reconstruction of the Social Fabric” is promoted in coordination with the Secretariat of the Social Assistance System. It involves the improvement of the immediate urban environments of people and their families.

The officials launching the project included the Secretary of Planning and Citizen Participation, Margarita Sierra Díaz de Rivera, and María del Carmen Bayardo Solórzano, Director of Strategic Projects, representing the Secretary of the Social Assistance System. They presented the program’s guidelines and its relevance to the State Government’s peace-building strategy. Alberto Esquer Gutiérrez also participated in this event.

(Article continued in right column)

(click here for the original version in Spanish).

Questions for this article:

Is there progress towards a culture of peace in Mexico?

(Article continued from left column)

The project is included, through various levels of intervention, to the cross-cutting theme indicated in the State Plan for Governance and Development (PEGD) and to the strategic themes of the State Program for a Culture of Peace.

The Secretariat for Planning and Citizen Participation is the governing body in charge of mainstreaming the Culture of Peace in the State of Jalisco and is responsible for coordinating the actions issued by the executive branch in matters of culture of peace, as well as mainstreaming, supervising, evaluating and proposing strategies to progressively integrate the peace approach in the different areas of government.

The head of the SPPC, Margarita Sierra, said that: “Everything we do is in terms of governance and with a focus on peace. We have to give meaning to government programs to respond to the need of citizens to live in peace in all their spaces.”

Among the institutional challenges that were raised are: training in the culture of peace; inter-institutional linkage and coordination, and the construction with citizens of an agenda to address territorial needs. To learn more about the culture of peace and governance, please access: participa.jalisco.gob.mx/participacion-ciudadana.

– – – – – –

If you wish to make a comment on this article, you may write to coordinator@cpnn-world.org with the title “Comment on (name of article)” and we will put your comment on line. Because of the flood of spam, we have discontinued the direct application of comments.

Colombia: Cúcuta Mayor’s Office Successfully Concludes Workshops on Historical Memory and Culture of Peace

.. DEMOCRATIC PARTICIPATION ..

An article from the Alcaldía de San José de Cúcuta (translation by CPNN)

The Secretariat for Post-Conflict and Culture of Peace has carried out workshops on historical memory, culture of peace and human rights. The project, carried out at the facilities of the Regional Center for Attention to Victims, concludes the measure “Action on historical memory, promotion of the culture of peace and promotion of human rights”, of the Return and Relocation Plans of the communities of Ciudad Rodeo and San Fernando del Rodeo, in the municipality of San José de Cúcuta.

(Article continued in right column)

(click here for the original version in Spanish).

Questions for this article:

What is happening in Colombia, Is peace possible?

(Article continued from left column)

During these meetings, the community became familiar with the basic concepts of historical memory and culture of peace, and deepened their knowledge of human rights. Through timelines, phrases and drawings, they described their surroundings, told their life stories, talked about their neighborhood and projected their aspirations for the future. Through various symbolic acts, they shared their experiences, promoting the recognition of the truth and contributing to their emotional and psychological repair, which helped heal the wounds of the past and strengthen the reconstruction of the social fabric.

The culture of peace workshops created spaces for young people from the municipality, promoting integration and the exchange of experiences. These activities facilitated the improvement of peace practices, using Hip Hop culture as an educational and transformative tool to face challenges, promote values ​​of peace and respect for human rights.

Through various dynamics, the youth sought to promote mutual respect, coexistence, understanding and social transformation through the arts.

Finally, it is important to highlight that all these workshops
contributed significantly to the process of reparation and reconciliation of the victims of the armed conflict, initiating a process of healing and rebuilding relationships based on respect, non-violence and peaceful coexistence; thus contributing to the construction of a more just, stable and harmonious society.
– – – – – –

If you wish to make a comment on this article, you may write to coordinator@cpnn-world.org with the title “Comment on (name of article)” and we will put your comment on line. Because of the flood of spam, we have discontinued the direct application of comments.

The Nobel Peace Prize: Does it go to the right people?

The following excerpt come the book by Frederik Heffermehl entitled, “The Real Nobel Prize” as reviewed in CPNN:

Considering the choices made by this committee over the years, Heffermehl says, “No doubt, the Norwegian committee has honored many fine people and purposes, humanitarian aid, democracy, resource conservation, the fight against poverty and child labor, for the environment, climate, human rights, education” but these do not correspond to Nobel’s testament as expressed in the following. Heffermehl concludes that only 36 awards over the 134 years pass the test.

“The words from the testament of Alfred Nobel: a prize ‘to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for creating the brotherhood of nations, for the abolition of reduction of standing armies, and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.’”

The Nobel Peace Prize of 2022 was a perfect example of the errors pointed out by Heffermehl. The organization granted the prize from Ukraine was funded by the US Dept of State and the US National Endowment for Democracy as part of its support for Ukraine in its war against Russia. The organization asks the West to engage in war against Russia on Ukrainian side by imposing no-fly zone and delivery of armaments.

Fortunately, the Nobel Peace Prize of 2024 was one that corresponds to the Nobel’s testament. As Joseph Gerson has said, “The Nobel Peace Prize awarded to Nihon Hidankyo is long overdue and could not come at a more important time. The Hibakusha (A-bomb witness/survivors) of Nihon Hidankyo have been among the world’s most courageous and steadfast advocates of nuclear disarmament. The organization has focused on three core demands: Preventing nuclear war, eliminating nuclear weapons, and obtaining essential medical care for A-bomb victims.

Here are the CPNN articles on this subject:

Nobel Peace Prize 2024 to Nihon Hidankyo against the menace of nuclear weapons

DISARMAMENT & SECURITY .

Excerpts from presentation speech by Jørgen Watne Frydnes, Chair of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, 10 December 2024.

Nihon Hidankyo, a grassroots movement of atomic bomb survivors from Hiroshima and Nagasaki, is receiving the Nobel Peace Prize for 2024 for its efforts to achieve a world free of nuclear weapons and for demonstrating through witness testimony that nuclear weapons must never be used again. . . . Thirteen Nobel Peace Prizes have been awarded, in full or in part, for peace efforts of this kind. On each occasion, the Norwegian Nobel Committee has warned against the menace of nuclear weapons. This year, that warning is more urgent than ever before. 


Frame from video of Tanaka’s speech

As 2025 approaches, the world is entering what many analysts characterise as a new, more unstable nuclear age. The role of nuclear weapons in international affairs is changing. The nuclear powers are modernising and upgrading their arsenals. New countries appear to be preparing to obtain nuclear weapons. Key arms control agreements are expiring without being replaced. And threats to use nuclear arms in ongoing warfare have been made openly and repeatedly. . . .

Nihon Hidankyo and the Hibakusha – the survivors of the atomic bomb attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki – have never wavered in their efforts to erect a worldwide moral and legal bulwark against the use of nuclear weapons. . .

To our dear guests from Nihon Hidankyo – to Terumi Tanaka, Toshiyuki Mimaki and Shigemitsu Tanaka – and to all the Hibakusha here today: It is an honour to be your hosts on this historic occasion, and we wish to express our deep gratitude for the outstanding and vital work you have performed in the course of your lives, and for all that you continue to do.

You did not resign yourselves to victimhood. You defined yourselves as survivors. You refused to sit in silent terror as the great powers led us through long periods of nuclear armament. You stood tall and shared your unique personal testimony with the entire world.  

A light in the darkest night. A path forward. You give us hope. . . .

– – – –

Excerpts from the speech of Terumi Tanaka on behalf of Nihon Hidankyo

Thank you for your introduction. I am Terumi Tanaka, one of the three Co-Chairpersons of Nihon Hidankyo. I am honored to speak on behalf of Nihon Hidankyo, the Nobel Peace laureate this year.

We established Nihon Hidankyo, the Japan Confederation of A- and H-Bomb Sufferers Organizations, in August 1956. Having ourselves survived the inhumane impacts of the atomic bombings, damage unprecedented in history, we launched this movement to ensure such suffering would never be repeated, with two basic demands. The first demand is that the State which started and carried out the war should compensate victims for the damage caused by the atomic bombs, in opposition to the Japanese government’s assertion that, “the sacrifice of war should be endured equally by the whole nation.” The second is to demand the immediate abolition of nuclear weapons, as extremely inhumane weapons of mass killing, which must not be allowed to coexist with humanity. . . .

I am one of the survivors of the atomic bombing of Nagasaki. At the time, I was 13 years old, at home, around 3 kilometers east of ground zero.

It was August 9, 1945. I suddenly heard the buzzing sound of a bomber jet, and was soon after engulfed in a bright, white light. Surprised, I ran downstairs and got down on the floor, covering my eyes and ears with my hands. The next moment, an intense shock wave passed through our entire house. I have no memory of that moment, but when I came to my senses, I found myself under a large, glass sliding door. It was a miracle that none of the glass was broken, and I was somehow spared injuries.

Three days later, I sought out the families of my two aunts who lived in the area near the hypocenter. It was then that I saw the full devastation of the bombing of Nagasaki. Walking with my mother, we went around a small mountain. Reaching a pass, we looked down in horror. Blackened ruins spread out as far as the port of Nagasaki, some three kilometers away. . . .

(Continued in right column)

Question related to this article:
 
Can we abolish all nuclear weapons?

The Nobel Peace Prize: Does it go to the right people?

(Continued from left column)

By the end of that year, 1945, the death toll in the two cities is thought to have been approximately 140,000 in Hiroshima and 70,000 in Nagasaki. 400,000 people are estimated to have been exposed to the atomic bombs, suffering injuries and surviving exposure to radiation. 

The survivors, the Hibakusha, were forced into silence by the occupying forces for seven years. Furthermore, they were also abandoned by the Japanese government. Thus, they spent more than a decade after the bombings in isolation, suffering from illness and hardship in their lives, while also enduring prejudice and discrimination.

The United States hydrogen bomb test at Bikini Atoll on March 1, 1954 resulted in the exposure of Japanese fishing boats to deadly radioactive fallout, or the “ashes of death.” Among others, all 23 crew members of the Daigo Fukuryu Maru were exposed to radiation and developed acute radiation sickness, and the tuna they caught were discarded. This incident triggered a nationwide petition calling for a total ban on atomic and hydrogen bombs and tests, which spread like wildfire throughout Japan. This gained over 30 million signatures and in August 1955, the first World Conference against Atomic and Hydrogen Bombs was held in Hiroshima, followed by the second in Nagasaki the following year. Encouraged by this movement, A-bomb survivors who participated in the World Conference formed the Japan Confederation of A- and H-bomb Sufferers Organizations, Nihon Hidankyo, on August 10, 1956 in Nagasaki.

In our founding declaration, Nihon Hidankyo expressed our determination to “save humanity from its crisis through the lessons learned from our experiences, while at the same time saving ourselves.” We launched a movement demanding both “the abolition of nuclear weapons, and State compensation for the atomic bomb damage suffered.”

Our initial campaign resulted in the enactment of the “A-Bomb Sufferers’ Medical Care Law” in 1957. However, the content of the law was limited: besides issuing “Atomic Bomb Survivor Certificates” and providing free medical examinations, medical expenses would be paid only for illnesses recognized as atomic bomb-related by the Minister of Health and Welfare. . . .

In April 2016, A-bomb survivors around the world launched the “International Signature Campaign in Support of the Appeal of the Hibakusha for the Elimination of Nuclear Weapons,” as proposed by Nihon Hidankyo. This campaign grew significantly, and over 13.7 million signatures were collected and submitted to the United Nations. We are overjoyed that on July 7, 2017, the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons was adopted with the support of 122 countries.

It is the heartfelt desire of the Hibakusha that, rather than depending on the theory of nuclear deterrence, which assumes the possession and use of nuclear weapons, we must not allow the possession of a single nuclear weapon.

Please try to imagine — there are 4,000 nuclear warheads, ready to be launched immediately. This means that damage hundreds or thousands of times greater than that which happened in Hiroshima and Nagasaki could happen right away. Any one of you could become either a victim or a perpetrator, at any time. I therefore plead for everyone around the world to discuss together what we must do to eliminate nuclear weapons, and demand action from governments to achieve this goal.

The average age of the A-bomb survivors is now 85. Ten years from now, there may only be a handful of us able to give testimony as firsthand survivors. From now on, I hope that the next generation will find ways to build on our efforts and develop the movement even further. . . .

To achieve further universalization of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons and the formulation of an international convention which will abolish nuclear weapons, I urge everyone around the world to create opportunities in your own countries to listen to the testimonies of A-bomb survivors, and to feel, with deep sensitivity, the true inhumanity of nuclear weapons. Particularly, I hope that the belief that nuclear weapons cannot — and must not — coexist with humanity will take firm hold among citizens of the nuclear weapon states and their allies, and that this will become a force for change in the nuclear policies of their governments.

Let not humanity destroy itself with nuclear weapons!

Let us work together for a human society, in a world free of nuclear weapons and of wars!

– – – – – –

If you wish to make a comment on this article, you may write to coordinator@cpnn-world.org with the title “Comment on (name of article)” and we will put your comment on line. Because of the flood of spam, we have discontinued the direct application of comments.

Slow Peace: Three Lessons from Grassroots Peacebuilders in Colombia

.. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ..

An article by Angela Lederach from Peace News (reprinted by permission)

Since 2014, I have had the privilege of learning from grassroots social leaders at the forefront of building peace in Montes de María, Colombia – one of the territories prioritized by the 2016 peace agreement between the FARC (Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia) and the government. 


Youth Peace Provokers March for Peace 2016, photo by author

A human rights lawyer who works closely with the Colombian transitional justice tribunal told me in June 2024 that one of the biggest challenges for the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP) was that the peace process was rushed. I have heard grassroots organizers frequently echo the sentiments of this human rights lawyer, admonishing the state for operating with “too much prisa [hurry].” 

As an anthropologist who studies the politics of peacebuilding, I was initially puzzled by the widespread critique of “prisa/hurry”. Indeed, sluggish, bureaucratic delays  have characterized the postaccord implementation  process across rural Colombia. Clearly, when grassroots peacebuilders criticize the state for operating with “too much prisa/hurry,” they are not suggesting that the accords are being implemented rapidly. What claims, then, are campesino peacebuilders making? And what does their approach to “paz sin prisa / peace without hurry” entail?

As I traversed the everyday landscapes of campesino peacebuilding, I began to realize that the call to “slowness” does not negate the pressing needs that animate the collective struggle for peace in Colombia. There is, in fact, a fierce urgency in the campesino call to slow down, take notice, and tend territorial relations of care in the wake of violence. Grassroots peacebuilders do not limit their understanding of time to speed (acceleration and deceleration) or duration (short and long-term frameworks). Instead, slowness is understood as a mode of attention and practice of presence. Slow peace  offers a relational framework that locates peacebuilding as a multigenerational, multispecies, and permanent process to cultivate a more just and livable world.
 
I have identified three lessons for building slow peace. 

First, slow peace is a multigenerational process

In August 2016, I interviewed Jorge, a campesino [small farmer] leader, in his palm-thatched home. Jorge did not begin his life history with the war. Instead, he recounted the ancestral history of the territory, emphasizing how nonviolent resistance and solidarity led to the formation of campesino communities across Montes de María as people sought refuge from enslavement and colonization. He closed our interview with a song he had composed. The war formed neither the opening nor closing stanza. Instead, Jorge sang about the multigenerational “campesino struggle” to “defend life and the right to life.”

Hours later, I learned that the Colombian government and the FARC-EP had reached a peace deal. With no internet or electricity, the historic announcement did not reach Jorge’s house. Jorge’s intimate recollections set against the distant and inaccessible backdrop of the government’s declaration of peace reflect the paradox of proximity that grassroots leaders face. 

Popular depictions of Montes de María, limited only to violence, erase the long histories of campesino organizing. A multigenerational lens challenges linear accounts that locate peace as something that comes after a negotiated agreement. Grafting their work into a wider struggle, campesino peacebuilders articulate an understanding of peace as an active, social process. In giving primacy to everyday life, slowing down widens the lens and focuses the frame of peacebuilding on the historical and material conditions that peace demands.

(Article continued in the right column)

Questions for this article:

What is the relation between the environment and peace

What is happening in Colombia, Is peace possible?

(Article continued from the left column)

Second, slow peace centers social-environmental relations 

“The earth suffered, too,” Jocabeth, a young campesina organizer reflected, detailing her experience of war. The violence of forced displacement disrupted multispecies relations  of care, forged through the daily labor of caretaking forest and soil life in Jocabeth’s community. The violent severing of humans from these ecological relations resulted in the death of the avocado forest, upending the social, economic, and ecological sustenance of her community. For Jocabeth, place-based peacebuilding practices that regenerate multispecies relations are vital for peace. 

As part of an intergenerational social movement, Jocabeth has worked with the Youth Peace Provokers to combine traditional ecological knowledge, reforestation, and agroecology with peace advocacy, nonviolent direct action, and community organizing. Here, slow peace cultivates moral dispositions attuned to the existence of the nearly imperceptible processes of life that persist amid violence – what I call an ethics of attention. As Ricardo Esquivia, the director of the local organization Sembrandopaz  reflected, “the work of the base (grassroots) is to see, feel, and grow the tree held within the seed – to be so close to the ground that you can feel the grass grow.”

Finally, slow peace demands a shift from technical projects to social movements. Campesinos cite the “clash in times” between their community processes and external peace interventions as one of the most difficult challenges they must overcome. Technocratic interventions  that rely on measurable outcomes and helicopter interactions designed to meet donor demands reduce peace to paper. In contrast, slow peace situates peacebuilding as an ongoing political process that prioritizes sustained proximity.

For example, the Regional Space for Peacebuilding in Montes de María  – a broad-based coalition that brings representatives from Afrodescendant, Indigenous, Campesino, youth, women, and LGBTQIA+ movements together – facilitates a sustained, monthly dialogue between these diverse grassroots peace organizations. The coalition has also convened unlikely encounters between community members and generals, paramilitary commanders, FARC representatives, and multinational corporations. These “improbable dialogues” have resulted in the formation of farming cooperatives between former combatants and victims, the return of dispossessed land, and formal apologies. The Regional Space’s approach to sustained dialogue demonstrates how a temporal shift from technical projects to community organizing deepens processes of social repair. The multigenerational, place-based, and permanent commitment to peacebuilding through sustained dialogue – exemplified in the work of the Regional Space – also allows grassroots organizations to build collective power desde la base – from the ground up.

In Montes de María, there is a traditional saying: “Slow down, because there is hurry.” Slowness emerges through an immersion into everyday life where the seeds of peace are continuously cultivated, cared for, and nurtured. “Slow peace” does not offer a prescriptive blueprint. However, reflecting on the relational practices, modes of attention, and quality of presence  that shape peoples’ experiences of time, relations, and power is vital for cultivating sustainable peace – with lessons for peacebuilders globally. 

– – – –

Angela J. Lederach (she/her/hers) is Assistant Professor of Peace and Justice Studies at Chapman University. She is the author of Feel the Grass Grow: Ecologies of Slow Peace in Colombia (Stanford University Press 2023) and co-author of When Blood and Bones Cry Out: Journeys Through the Soundscape of Healing and Reconciliation (Oxford University Press 2010). As a cultural anthropologist and peace studies scholar-practitioner, Lederach has worked on peacebuilding and restorative justice processes in Sierra Leone, Philippines, Colombia, and the United States.

– – – – – –

If you wish to make a comment on this article, you may write to coordinator@cpnn-world.org with the title “Comment on (name of article)” and we will put your comment on line. Because of the flood of spam, we have discontinued the direct application of comments.