Sobre la margen izquierda aquí debajo, usted podrá encontrar un artículo de CPNN y sobre la margen derecha su debate. Usted está invitado a leer y a debatir haciendo click sobre alguna de las preguntas que se encuentran en el siguiente listado aquí debajo, o si lo desea puede proponer una nueva pregunta. Por favor, tómese el tiempo de tildar una de las opciones aquí debajo para elegir el nivel de prioridad que según su consideración tiene este artículo.

Aprender Escribir Leer Inicio Quiénes somos Discutir Buscar Boletin Contacto
por ámbito de acción
por región
por categoría
por fecha
Naciones Unidas y Cultura de Paz
Movimiento Mundial para una Cultura de Paz
Valores, Actitudes, Acciones
Reglas de CPNN
Enviar un Articulo
Sea un reportero de CPNN

7 Things You Need to Know about the Resolution on Women and Disarmament from UNGA First Committee
un articulo por Lorey Campese, Control Arms Blog

During the UN General Assembly First Committee, a resolution was adopted this year on the role of women and broader international security. Of 63 resolutions adopted, it was easily the most hotly debated with multiple meetings scheduled nearly every week to negotiate the text of the resolution.

click on photo to enlarge

The resolution achieved substantive progress from previous editions and called for real action. That’s something you don’t always see in resolutions.

Here are 7 things you need know about First Committee’s hottest resolution this year:

1. The rise of a resolution

The General Assembly has seen the Women, disarmament, non-proliferation and arms control resolution before. It was introduced three times in the past four years. But this year’s edition looked much different. It took general and vague language that easily gathered consensus in from 2010-2013 and gave it some teeth. At the United Nations, when you get agreement on anything, it’s easy to simply leave it alone and say the same thing year after year. The leaders for this resolution chose a different path and had to use serious diplomacy and hard work to achieve the results. That’s a small example of how change happens in a system that, at times, appears to be allergic to it.

2. Arms Trade Treaty impact

During informal discussions, one diplomat (that doesn’t like the ATT very much) argued that they have a problem with “any reference to the Arms Trade Treaty” in the resolution. I’m sure they know that the ATT is the first piece of international treaty to ever mention gender-based violence. But that historic bit of info takes a back seat to politics from time to time. The ATT was the center of discussion in every consultation on the resolution, but progressive leaders stood firm and ensured that the Arms Trade Treaty had its place in a resolution where it truly belonged. Perhaps even more interesting is that a handful of countries that didn’t vote in favor the ATT’s adoption a year and a half ago voted to KEEP the reference in this resolution. Countries co- sponsoring the resolution also included some ATT- abstainers such as Bolivia. These small shifts in voting are indicative of progress for the lifesaving treaty.

3. Risk assessments

Not only was there a reference a reference to the ATT, but the resolution also called for “national risk assessment criteria to facilitate the prevention of arms to commit violence against women.” The translation from legalese to English is as follows: the ATT says that countries have to take into account the risk of weapons being used to commit gender- based violence, before they can authorize a transfer. This resolution encourages countries to develop risk- assessment criteria. A small step, but one that’s important enough to save lives and hold violating governments accountable.

(This article is continued in the discussionboard)


No hay pregunta ligada a este article.

* * * * *

Comentario más reciente:

(The following is continued from the main article listed above.)

4. 98 co-sponsors

The resolution was cosponsored by nearly 100 countries. For those counting, that’s more than half of the entire world. A co-sponsorship signals two things: that the government is firmly behind all of the provisions of the resolution AND that they are guaranteed to vote yes on it. Any time you have any action at the UN with half the membership on board, you have to call that a win.

5. Small States, big impact

ATT negotiations showed that you didn’t have to be an economic or political powerhouse to change the world. Sure, the US, China, Russia, the UK, and others flexed their muscle, but countries like New Zealand, Iceland, and Costa Rica also showed that everyone has an important role to play when it comes to saving lives. Trinidad and Tobago’s leadership in leveling the playing field for women in disarmament and arms control shows once again that small states can have massive impact at the United Nations.

6. . ... continuación.

Este artículo ha sido publicado on line el November 12, 2014.