Dutch to set up global abortion support fund to counter Trump’s cuts

. . . . HUMAN RIGHTS . . . . .

An article from Reuters (reprinted by permission)

The Netherlands is launching a global fund to help women access abortion services to compensate for U.S. President Donald Trump’s ban on U.S. federal funding for foreign groups providing abortions or abortion support for family
planning abroad.


Protesters gather for the Women’s March in Oslo, Norway, January 21, 2017. The march is being held in solidarity with similar events taking place internationaly. NTB Scanpix/Stian Lysberg Solum via REUTERS
Click on image to enlarge

The Dutch government has held preliminary discussions on the initiative with other European Union members who have responded positively, a foreign ministry spokesman said on Wednesday. Governments outside the EU, companies and social institutions will also be approached to participate.

Trump on Monday reinstated a policy that requires foreign NGOs who receive U.S. global family planning funds to certify that they do not perform abortions or provide abortion advice as a method of family planning.

Dutch officials estimate that Trump’s restrictions will cause a funding shortfall of $600 million over the next four years. Women’s rights and health campaigners have reacted with anger at Trump’s move. They say restrictions on abortion endanger women’s lives. Trump has also pledged to withdraw funding from U.S. domestic abortion services.

The policy was announced on Tuesday by Liliane Ploumen, minister for international development cooperation, whose Labour Party – the junior coalition partner in the government – is traditionally staunchly in favour of abortion rights.

The Netherlands’s laws on reproduction and reproductive health are among the world’s most liberal. The Dutch vote in parliamentary elections in March.

Foreign ministry spokesman Herman van Gelderen said he was confident relations with the new U.S. administration would not be damaged by the measure.

“Where decisions are taken that are bad for women in developing countries we should help those women,” he said. “It’s not about the politics, it’s about those women.”

The policy also prohibits U.S. federal assistance for foreign groups that use non-U.S. funds for those abortion services or lobby foreign governments to legalise abortion, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation, which looks at U.S. global health policy.

Intermittently implemented by U.S. governments since 1984, Barack Obama lifted the measure at the start of his own presidency in 2009. It does not apply to abortion or abortion advice in cases where a pregnancy is a risk to the life of the mother or has resulted from incest or rape.

(Thank you to Janet Hudgins, the CPNN reporter for this article)

Question related to this article:

Women’s reproductive rights: are they being respected?

Janet adds the following to this article.

Dutch International Development Minister, Lilianne Ploumen, said earlier this week that as many as 20 countries had indicated their support for the effort to replace the $600 million U.S. in funding that will be lost because of Trump’s decision.

“Yes, we will support the [Dutch] effort,” Canada’s counterpart, Marie-Claude Bibeau said.

The US president carries through on campaign promises but apprehensive advocates and governments around the globe react with such engagement as we haven’t seen for a very long time.

Trump’s announcement that he will stop other countries from supporting family planning, that is, they must be certified as not providing abortions or lose funding, speaks to another of his misguided instincts for control. What with the power he holds now, he is in his element with this syndrome of many men. As women have the ultimate power—of populating the planet, or not—the Trumps of the world are driven to find a way to take it away and this performance exposes the US president as one of those by withdrawing support for global family planning to the tune of $600 million.

As Trump withdraws aid from and denounces countries providing abortions or support for abortions, Holland and Canada react with commitments to fill the gap. As well, discussions begin with other EU members and countries outside. This may result in the kind of weight of interest and aid that is so desperately needed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *