CPNN discussion concerning the question “Can we abolish all nuclear weapons?”

TFF PressInfo # 354: Open Letter – Political responsibility in the Nuclear Age
January 21st, 2016

By Richard Falk, David Krieger and Robert Laney

Prefatory Note

What follows here is An Open Letter to the American People: Political Responsibility in the Nuclear Age. It was jointly written by Richard Falk in collaboration with David Krieger and Robert Laney. The three of us have been long connected with the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, NAPF.

The NAPF focuses its effort on the menace posed by nuclear weaponry and the urgency of seeking nuclear disarmament. The nuclear agreement with Iran and the North Korean nuclear test explosion are reminders of the gravity of the issue, and should serve as warnings against the persistence of complacency, which seems to be the prevailing political mood judging from the policy debates that have taken place during the early stages of the 2016 presidential campaign.

This complacency is encouraged by the media that seems to have forgotten about nuclear dangers since the end of the Cold War, except for those concerned with proliferation of the weaponry to countries hostile to the United States and the West (Iran, North Korea).

Our letter proceeds on the assumption that the core of the problem is associated with the possession, development, and deployment of the weaponry, that is, with the nine nuclear weapons states. The essence of a solution is to eliminate existing nuclear weapons arsenals through a phased, verified process of nuclear disarmament as legally mandated by Article VI of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (1968).

We would be grateful if you could help us reach the widest possible audience through reposting and dissemination via social media networks.*

• •

Dear fellow citizens:

By their purported test of a hydrogen bomb early in 2016, North Korea reminded the world that nuclear dangers are not an abstraction, but a continuing menace that the governments and peoples of the world ignore at their peril. Even if the test were not of a hydrogen bomb but of a smaller atomic weapon, as many experts suggest, we are still reminded that we live in the Nuclear Age, an age in which accident, miscalculation, insanity or intention could lead to devastating nuclear catastrophe.

What is most notable about the Nuclear Age is that we humans, by our scientific and technological ingenuity, have created the means of our own demise. The world currently is confronted by many threats to human wellbeing, and even civilizational survival, but we focus here on the particular grave dangers posed by nuclear weapons and nuclear war.

Even a relatively small nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan, with each country using 50 Hiroshima-size nuclear weapons on the other side’s cities, could result in a nuclear famine killing some two billion of the most vulnerable people on the planet. A nuclear war between the U.S. and Russia could destroy civilization in a single afternoon and send temperatures on Earth plummeting into a new ice age.

Such a war could destroy most complex life on the planet. Despite the gravity of such threats, they are being ignored, which is morally reprehensible and politically irresponsible.

We in the United States are in the midst of hotly contested campaigns to determine the candidates of both major political parties in the 2016 presidential faceoff, and yet none of the frontrunners for the nominations have even voiced concern about the nuclear war dangers we face. This is an appalling oversight. It reflects the underlying situation of denial and complacency that disconnects the American people as a whole from the risks of use of nuclear weapons in the years ahead.

This menacing disconnect is reinforced by the media, which has failed to challenge the candidates on their approach to this apocalyptic weaponry during the debates and has ignored the issue in their television and print coverage, even to the extent of excluding voices that express concern from their opinion pages. We regard it as a matter of urgency to put these issues back on the radar screen of public awareness.

We are appalled that none of the candidates running for the highest office in the land has yet put forward any plans or strategy to end current threats of nuclear annihilation, none has challenged the planned expenditure of $1 trillion to modernize the U.S. nuclear arsenal, and none has made a point of the U.S. being in breach of its nuclear disarmament obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

In the presidential debates it has been a non-issue, which scandalizes the candidates for not raising the issue in their many public speeches and the media for not challenging them for failing to do so. As a society, we are out of touch with the most frightening, yet after decades still dangerously mishandled, challenge to the future of humanity.

There are nine countries that currently possess nuclear weapons. Five of these nuclear-armed countries are parties to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (U.S., Russia, UK, France and China), and are obligated by that treaty to negotiate in good faith for a cessation of the nuclear arms race and for nuclear disarmament.

The other four nuclear-armed countries (Israel, India, Pakistan and North Korea) are subject to the same obligations under customary international law. None of the nine nuclear-armed countries has engaged in such negotiations, a reality that should be met with anger and frustration, and not, as is now the case, with indifference.

It is not only the United States that is responsible for the current state of denial and indifference. Throughout the world there is a false confidence that, because the Cold War is over and no nuclear weapons have been used since 1945, the nuclear dangers that once frightened and concerned people can now be ignored.

Rather than fulfill their obligations for negotiated nuclear disarmament, the nine nuclear-armed countries all rely upon nuclear deterrence and are engaged in modernization programs that will keep their nuclear arsenals active through the 21st century and perhaps beyond.

Unfortunately, nuclear deterrence does not actually provide security to countries with nuclear arsenals.

Rather, it is a hypothesis about human behavior, which is unlikely to hold up over time. Nuclear deterrence has come close to failing on numerous occasions and would clearly be totally ineffective, or worse, against a terrorist group in possession of one or more nuclear weapons, which has no fear of retaliation and may actually welcome it.

Further, as the world is now embarking on a renewed nuclear arms race, disturbingly reminiscent of the Cold War, rising risks of confrontations and crises between major states possessing nuclear weapons increase the possibility of use.

As citizens of a nuclear-armed country, we are also targets of nuclear weapons.

John F. Kennedy saw clearly that “Every man, woman and child lives under a nuclear sword of Damocles, hanging by the slenderest of threads, capable of being cut at any moment by accident, or miscalculation, or by madness. The weapons of war must be abolished before they abolish us.”

What President Kennedy vividly expressed more than 50 years ago remains true today, and even more so as the weapons proliferate and as political extremist groups come closer to acquiring these terrible weapons.

Those with power and control over nuclear weapons could turn this planet, unique in all the universe in supporting life, into the charred remains of a Global Hiroshima.

Should any political leader or government hold so much power?

Should we be content to allow such power to rest in any hands at all?

It is time to end the nuclear weapons era. We are living on borrowed time.

The U.S., as the world’s most powerful country, must play a leadership role in convening negotiations. For the U.S. to be effective in leading to achieve Nuclear Zero, U.S. citizens must awaken to the need to act and must press our government to act and encourage others elsewhere, especially in the other eight nuclear-armed countries, to press their governments to act as well.

It is not enough to be apathetic, conformist, ignorant or in denial. We all must take action if we want to save humanity and other forms of life from nuclear catastrophe.

In this spirit, we are at a stage where we need a robust global solidarity movement that is dedicated to raising awareness of the growing nuclear menace, and the urgent need to act nationally, regionally and globally to reverse the strong militarist currents that are pushing the world ever closer to the nuclear precipice.

Nuclear weapons are the most immediate threat to humanity, but they are not the only technology that could play and is playing havoc with the future of life. The scale of our technological impact on the environment (primarily fossil fuel extraction and use) is also resulting in global warming and climate chaos, with predicted rises in ocean levels and many other threats – ocean acidification, extreme weather, climate refugees and strife from drought – that will cause massive death and displacement of human and animal populations.

In addition to the technological threats to the human future, many people on the planet now suffer from hunger, disease, lack of shelter and lack of education. Every person on the planet has a right to adequate nutrition, health care, housing and education. It is deeply unjust to allow the rich to grow richer while the vast majority of humanity sinks into deeper poverty.

It is immoral to spend our resources on modernizing weapons of mass annihilation while large numbers of people continue to suffer from the ravages of poverty.

Doing all we can to move the world to Nuclear Zero, while remaining responsive to other pressing dangers, is our best chance to ensure a benevolent future for our species and its natural surroundings.

We can start by changing apathy to empathy, conformity to critical thinking, ignorance to wisdom, denial to recognition, and thought to action in responding to the threats posed by nuclear weapons and the technologies associated with global warming, as well as to the need to address present human suffering arising from war and poverty.

The richer countries are challenged by migrant flows of desperate people that number in the millions and by the realization that as many as a billion people on the planet are chronically hungry and another two billion are malnourished, resulting in widespread growth stunting among children and other maladies.

While ridding the world of nuclear weaponry is our primary goal, we are mindful that the institution of war is responsible for chaos and massive casualties, and that we must also challenge the militarist mentality if we are ever to enjoy enduring peace and security on our planet.

The fate of our species is now being tested as never before.

The question before us is whether humankind has the foresight and discipline necessary to forego some superfluous desires, mainly curtailing propensities for material luxuries and for domination of our fellow beings, thereby enabling all of us and succeeding generations to live lives worth living. Whether our species will rise to this challenge is uncertain, with current evidence not reassuring.

The time is short and what is at risk is civilization and every small and great thing that each of us loves and treasures on our planet.

* This Open Letter has been published in The Nation on January 14, 2016.

This question pertains to the following articles

A divided UN General Assembly votes on nuclear disarmament resolutions

Nuclear Abolition Day: Security Council session clashes with UN High-Level Meeting

USA: Former Marine to Create Legacy of Peace

Women legislators release appeal for common security for a sustainable and nuclear-weapon-free world

UN chief launches new disarmament agenda ‘to secure our world and our future’

Nuclear Weapon States’ Long Arm Seen Behind Deferral of Landmark UN Conference

Physician Leaders Urge All States to Sign Nuclear Weapons Treaty

USA: Oak Ridge Environmental Peace Alliance

Campaign for Compliance with the Nuclear Ban Treaty

March 28: 1st meeting of UN High-Level Conference on Nuclear Disarmament

Nobel Peace Prize Lecture – 2017 – Beatrice Fihn

Nobel Peace Prize Lecture – 2017 – Setsuko Thurlow

Spanish action to support the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons

Pope Francis denounces nuclear weapons possession

Prague: International youth conference: Reaching High for a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World

Spreading Hiroshima’s Message of Peace

The Nobel Peace Prize for 2017

United Nations High-Level Meeting on the Total Elimination of Nuclear Weapons

At the United Nations, leaders voice support for nuclear ban treaty

Parliamentarians for Nuclear Nonproliferation and Disarmament releases Action Plan for a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World

Belarus: OSCE parliamentarians adopt Minsk Declaration with comprehensive recommendations for peace and prosperity

Unfold Zero: Making Use of the New Nuclear Ban Treaty

Historic agreement banning nuclear weapons a “victory for our shared humanity”, ICRC says

Richard Falk: Challenging Nuclearism: The Nuclear Ban Treaty Assessed

UN conference adopts treaty banning nuclear weapons

UN: Conference Considers Revised Draft of Proposed Legally Binding Instrument to Prohibit Nuclear Weapons

UN nuclear ban treaty negotiations: transit, threat and nuclear weapons financing

UN Conference Concludes First Reading of Draft Legally Binding Instrument to Prohibit Nuclear Weapons

Banning landmines taught us how to bring about real change in the world, now we’re sharing these lessons to ban nuclear weapons

Countries for and against the UN resolution to launch negotiations for a treaty to prohibit nuclear weapons

United Nations: WILPF statement to the 2017 NPT Preparatory Committee

Brooklyn, US: Forum: One Struggle, Many Fronts: No Nukes, War, Wall or Warming

United Nations: Women’s Rally and March to Ban the Bomb

Abolition 2000 Annual Meeting: Supports Women’s March. Calls for Nuclear Risk Reduction

UN commences nuclear abolition negotiations

Bid Adieu To Voice Of International Law Jurist C.G Weeramantry…

Open Letter to President-elect Donald Trump on Nuclear Weapons

Civil Society and the UN High Level Conference on Nuclear Disarmament

UN votes to outlaw nuclear weapons in 2017

UN talks recommend negotiations of nuclear weapons ban treaty

Banning Nukes: Divergence and Consensus at the UN Working Group on Nuclear Disarmament

USA: Over Seventy Prominent Scholars and Activists Urge Obama to meet Hibakusha, Take Further Steps on Nuclear Disarmament

The historic visit of Barack Obama to Hiroshima marks a new stage in the international mobilization against nuclear weapons

Text of President Obama’s Speech in Hiroshima, Japan

David v Goliath: Marshall Islands take on nuclear powers at UN court

33 Latin American and Caribbean states endorse Austrian Pledge and call for negotiations on a nuclear ban treaty

Peace and Planet Events, April 24-26 in New York City

La reunión humanitaria de mayor convocatoria mundial toma posición contra las armas nucleares

La plus grande réunion humanitaire du monde prend position contre les armes nucleares

World's Largest Humanitarian Meeting Takes Position against Nuclear Weapons

Ten Actions for Nuclear Abolition Day – June 2

U.S. Conference of Mayors Adopts Strong New Mayors for Peace Resolution

Poster exhibition on the atomic bomb damage

Oslo: Historic global conference prepares ground for new initiative towards ban treaty

Nuclear arms: the big questions…

Armes nucléaires : les bonnes questions…

The Hiroshima Appeal

Les Forces Nucléaires Diminuent, mais leur Modernisation se Poursuit, selon le SIPRI

Las Fuerzas Nucleares se Reducen pero Continúa su Modernización, Afirma el SIPRI

Nuclear forces reduced while modernizations continue, says SIPRI

U.S. Conference of Mayors Adopts Bold Resolution on Nuclear Disarmament

Nuclear disarmament: Greenpeace Champions the Marshall Islands

Movimiento Cubano por la Paz y la Soberanía de los Pueblos

Cuban movement for peace and sovereignty of peoples

Nuclear Weapons Production in the US

Sir Joseph Rotblat: A Legacy of Peace (1908-2005)

Click here for earlier CPNN discussions on this subject.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *