inglés francés |
Sobre la margen izquierda aquí debajo, usted podrá encontrar un artículo de CPNN y sobre la margen derecha su debate. Usted está invitado a leer y a debatir haciendo click sobre alguna de las preguntas que se encuentran en el siguiente listado aquí debajo, o si lo desea puede proponer una nueva pregunta. Por favor, tómese el tiempo de tildar una de las opciones aquí debajo para elegir el nivel de prioridad que según su consideración tiene este artículo. |
|
Two Modes of UN Peacebuilding
After I read the article I was surprised that the two modes had quite a few differences such as different aims, Integrated mode depends more on help from the United Nations than the Hierarchical mode, and both modes do not remove the cause of violence in the country entirely, but sets up peaceful ways to deal with the cause of violence.
A point the author made was at the end there are four research questions that we can ask of the two modes: What does the Sierra Leone experience tell us about the merits and challenges of each mode? To what extent is the hierarchical mode insufficient and the integrated mode necessary for peace building success? To what extent is civil society engagement and popular inclusion necessary for successful peace building? What are the institutional obstacles that impede the UN from adopting the integrated mode?
Each question is critical about the UN modes of Peace building and how affective they are. To me both modes have their pros and cons and both do their best to help the country build peace. If a person reads this article when they are finished they should have a good opinion on UN Peacebuilding and how each mode is as the author put it, “two opposite ends of a spectrum and any present and future UN Peace missions will fall somewhere in between”(Lawrence).
|
|
DISCUSSION * * * * *
Comentario más reciente:
: |
||||
Este artículo ha sido publicado on line el
.
|