inglés
francés
GLOBAL MOVEMENT FOR A CULTURE OF PEACE

Sobre la margen izquierda aquí debajo, usted podrá encontrar un artículo de CPNN y sobre la margen derecha su debate. Usted está invitado a leer y a debatir haciendo click sobre alguna de las preguntas que se encuentran en el siguiente listado aquí debajo, o si lo desea puede proponer una nueva pregunta. Por favor, tómese el tiempo de tildar una de las opciones aquí debajo para elegir el nivel de prioridad que según su consideración tiene este artículo.

Aprender Escribir Leer Inicio Quiénes somos Discutir Buscar Boletin Contacto
por ámbito de acción
por región
por categoría
por fecha
Naciones Unidas y Cultura de Paz
Movimiento Mundial para una Cultura de Paz
Valores, Actitudes, Acciones
Reglas de CPNN
Enviar un Articulo
Sea un reportero de CPNN


The culture of peace concept is advancing
un articulo por David Adams

Several years ago I made a quantitative analysis of the advance of the concept of human rights over the years. The resulting graph is quite spectacular. For the first few decades after 1948 when the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was adopted, there was scarcely any reference to human rights in the academic literature. Then references started to pick up in the 1990's and by the first decade of this century there was over 10,000 references a year. Probably the Nobel Prize to Amnesty International in 1977 played a role in this dramatic increase.


Number of citations per year of "culture of peace" in the academic literature: Sociological Abstracts in red; Science Citation Index in black

click on photo to enlarge

So recently I decided to do a similar analysis for the concept of the culture of peace over the years since it was supported by resolutions at UNESCO and the United Nations beginning in 1992. Here is the graph for academic references, using data from the Social Science Citation Index (black) and Sociological Abstracts (red). The former can only be done for English, while the latter includes data from Spanish, French and Portuguese as well as English.

Although there is a clear advance shown on the graph, the numbers are still tiny in comparision to the figures for human rights which are 10,000 per year.

It may be considered that academics are always somewhat slow to pick up a new concept, and so I have looked also at references to culture of peace on an Internet search engine for news sources (Google news). Here the numbers are more impressive for today (February 14): 74 references to "culture of peace", 54 references to "culture de paix" or "culture de la paix" and 63 references to "cultura da paz" (Portuguese).

But the big surprise, which is very good news, is the number of references to the Spanish version "cultura de paz." As of today there are 1,540 recent news articles listed in Google news with this phrase!

Perhaps one should not be surprised since, on the basis of the many articles from Latin America in last month's CPNN bulletin, I wrote in my monthly blog that Latin America is the "leading edge" of the global movement for a culture of peace.

DISCUSSION

Pregunta(s) relacionada(s) al artículo :


How can we know if the culture of peace is advancing?,

* * * * *

Comentario más reciente: :

One way we can NOT know if the culture of peace is advancing is from projects like the Global Peace Index which has recently been reviewed in CPNN.

The Global Peace Index measures the old dimensions of war and peace, not the new dimensions of culture or war / culture of peace.    Peace, in the old paradigm was the period between wars when countries were preparing themselves for the next war.    Culture of Peace, the new paradigm, is concerned with the deep roots of war, its cultural basis.

That can explain the paradox that it is the wealthy countries of the North that score highest on the index (Denmark, Austria, Switzerland and Finland), countries of Europe, which was involved in both the World Wars and which continue to profit from the unequal terms of trade between North and South which is enforced by the culture of war.  

When I was at UNESCO, the African ambassadors had the following to say: "One should not look to the South for the causes of the culture of war; instead, pose three questions. From where do the weapons come? From where do the violent television programmes come? And where are the terms of trade decided that impoverish the people of the South which leads to violence? "


Este artículo ha sido publicado on line el February 14, 2013.