Sur la gauche ci-dessous, vous trouverez un article de CPNN et sur la droite la discussion qui s'y rapporte. Vous êtes invité à lire et à discuter en cliquant sur l'une des questions listées ici, ou, si vous le souhaitez, poser une nouvelle question. Prenez le temps de cocher l'un des boutons ci-dessous en choisissant le niveau de priorité qui doit être donné à cet article.

S'informer Êcrire Lire Accueil L'équipe Discuter Rechercher S'inscrire Contact
par domain d'action
par région
par catégorie
par date
Les Nations Unis et la Culture de Paix
Le Mouvement Mondial pour une Culture de Paix
Valeurs, Attitudes, Actions
CPNN Reglements
Envoyer un Rapport
Devenez un Reporter de CPNN

UN General Assembly Approves Language Supporting Unarmed Civilian Protection
un article par Nonviolent Peaceforce

The UN General Assembly (UNGA) today (December 15) approved a Resolution on Follow- up to the Declaration of Programme of Action on the Culture of Peace, A/69/L.34, put forth by Bangladesh and co-sponsored by over 100 countries. Language noting unarmed civilian protection (UCP) was contained in the resolution, marking the first time UCP has been officially referenced in a UGA Resolution. The resolution notes:

Natalie Sikorski, NP Advocacy intern, monitors the General Assembly deliberations on the resolution for the Culture of Peace.

click on photo to enlarge

"...the initiatives of civil society, in collaboration with governments, to strengthen civilian capacities to enhance the physical safety of vulnerable populations under threat of violence and to promote peaceful settlement of disputes..."

In his introductory remarks, Ambassador Abdul Momen, the Permanent Representative of Bangladesh to the UN noted the urgency to build the Culture of Peace that is the aspiration of all humanity. “To move away from the chaos and violence, the Culture of Peace is the answer,” he urged.

He went on to recognize the strong role of women in promoting peace and urged that the Culture of Peace be included in the Post 2015 Sustainable Development Goals.

In support of the resolution, Ambassador Libran Cabactulan, the Philippines Permanent Representative to the UN, observed, “Without peace there can be no sustainable development,” Ambassador Cabactulan introduced the GA resolution A/69/L.41 promoting interreligious and intercultural dialogue which was considered by the UNGA at the same time. “Peace can only come when we have interreligious and intercultural dialogue. It was at the heart of the comprehensive agreement signed in the Philippines last March.” The Philippines mission played a lead role on the UCP language.

Nonviolent Peaceforce (NP) is proud to have UCP noted by the UNGA as part of the Culture of Peace. “It is not a coincidence that NP grew up during the decade of the Culture of Peace (2001- 2010),” observed NP’s Mel Duncan. “The Culture of Peace sets the global context for UCP to develop.”

“This opportunity should be taken advantage of to elaborate and firmly establish unarmed civilian protection as part of the Culture of Peace,” suggested Ambassador Anwarul Chowdhury, the prime advocate behind the original Culture of Peace resolutions and founder of the Global Movement for the Culture of Peace [Editor's note: the culture of peace resolutions were formulated by UNESCO and sent to the UN beginning in 1995, culminating in the Declaration and Programme of Action on a Culture of Peace in 1999. Ambassador Chowdhury became their advocate at the UN during that time.]

Next steps include having UCP considered by the UN’s High Level Peace Operations Panel who’s recommendations are due at the end of April as well as having UCP further recognized in UNGA resolutions and the Secretary General’s report on the Culture of Peace.


Question(s) liée(s) à cet article:

Can peace be guaranteed through nonviolent means?,

* * * * *

Commentaire le plus récent:

We have the advantage of an independent evaluation of the Nonviolent Peaceforce initiative in the Philippines conducted by Swisspeace.  The evaluation is very favorable, although in the end, as one reads through it, gets the impression that such initiatives can help but cannot bring peace by themselves.

Here is the executive summary:

Nonviolent Peaceforce in the Philippines can look back at more than two years of unique, relevant contributions and constructive engagement in one of the most difficult, political and volatile, contexts to work in: Being the only international non-governmental organization working with and living in close proximity to the most conflict-affected population in Mindanao, NP in the Philippines was able to support and enhance local structures of cease-fire monitoring, early warning, cross-community dialogues, human rights protection, to offer civilian protection and help to reduce the high levels of community violence.

The accepted offer to NP in the Philippines in late 2009 by the conflict parties GRP and the MILF to join the International Monitoring Team1 (IMT) and its Civilian Protection Component is a direct expression and result of its successful contributions to non-violence and violence reduction of the last two years.

To keep up the important work of NP’s project in the Philippines in the years to come, it is essential to ensure that the activities and objectives of NPP are based on a strategically and conceptually sound footing. This seems even more important given that NPP is going through a remarkable consolidation and expansion phase at the time of report-writing.

The re-focus on its key mandate, strengths and strategic advantages in Mindanao gives NP the opportunity to further enhance its unique work in the area of nonviolence,  peacekeeping and peacebuilding.

Cet article a été mis en ligne le January 2, 2015.