anglais
espagnol
GLOBAL MOVEMENT FOR A CULTURE OF PEACE

Sur la gauche ci-dessous, vous trouverez un article de CPNN et sur la droite la discussion qui s'y rapporte. Vous êtes invité à lire et à discuter en cliquant sur l'une des questions listées ici, ou, si vous le souhaitez, poser une nouvelle question. Prenez le temps de cocher l'un des boutons ci-dessous en choisissant le niveau de priorité qui doit être donné à cet article.

S'informer Êcrire Lire Accueil L'équipe Discuter Rechercher S'inscrire Contact
par domain d'action
par région
par catégorie
par date
Les Nations Unis et la Culture de Paix
Le Mouvement Mondial pour une Culture de Paix
Valeurs, Attitudes, Actions
CPNN Reglements
Envoyer un Rapport
Devenez un Reporter de CPNN


Preparing for the UN Summit on Sustainable Development
un article par Hugo

I am professionally bound to the United Nations whose ideals I always have felt strongly drawn to. Nonetheless, I recently experienced a state of frustration and sadness when attending the negotiations on the implementation of Agenda 21. Agenda 21 is the important action plan adopted by 189 nations at Rio de Janeiro in 1992, to guide humanity towards the new millennium in a spirit of peace, constructive co-operation and respect for the Earth. For more information, see The Johannesburg Summit on the Internet.

The Earth Summit called by the UN at Rio de Janiero projected a vision of development balanced between our economic and social needs and the capacity of the Earth's resources and ecosystems to meet current and future needs - a powerful long-term vision. However, 10 years later, despite initiatives by Governments, international organizations, business, civil society groups and individuals to achieve this type of development, called "sustainable development", progress towards the goals retained in Agenda 21 has been slower than anticipated. In some respects conditions are actually worse than they were 10 years ago. Now, I got the feeling that there was even less change in the vested interests of the parties as my own professional experience had taught me over the years, be it with respect to fierce liberalism, or the claim to repeat unsustainable development patterns rightfully, following the path of the richer part of the world.

Nonetheless, the negotiation process I attended was accompanied by so many promising encounters with so many people committed to universally shared values and ideals, that I had to understand the value of patience and compliance with the human condition. The overall process might look staggering and even send out pessimist signs. However, the steps to achieve progress at a broader level are sustained myriad inputs of personal will and exchange, under conditions of friendship, understanding, personal effort, shared vision and beauty.

DISCUSSION

Question(s) liée(s) à cet article:


Despite the vested interests of companies and governments, Can we make progress toward sustainable development?

* * * * *

Commentaire le plus récent:

[responding to CPNN article The film 'Demain', a manifesto?

Yes initiatives from the grassroots are important and necessary which will have a direct impact on the present and the future. But there are governments like India which are conscious of over exploitation of the earth’s resources and are taking suitable policy measures and also taking legal action against the exploiters.

We must emphasize public transportation and reduce our dependence on individual cars even though the auto industry will not like this.

Otherwise it is not demain but aujourdhui — the problems are there for us to see.


Cet article a été mis en ligne le April 11, 2002.