DISCUSSION

GLOBAL MOVEMENT FOR A CULTURE OF PEACE

Home page and navigation bar

L'accueil et la barre de navigation

La recepción y la barra de navegación

You are invited to take part in any of the discussion questions. To write a reply or change language, you must be registered (click on "Register" below) and then log in.

Vous êtes invité à participer aux forums ci-dessous. Avant d'écrire, vous devez vous enregistrer (cliquez ci-dessous) et ensuite inscrivez vous.

Usted está invitado a participar de los forums que se encuentran aquí debajo. Antes de escribir, debe registrarse (clickear abajo) y entonces conectar..


» Welcome Guest

» Log In :: Register :: Search :: Help

» Bienvenue Invité

» Inscrire :: Enregistrer :: Rechercher :: Aide

» Bienvenido Invitado

» Conectar :: Registro :: Búsqueda :: Ayuda


 

[ Track this question :: Email this question :: Print this question ]

Question: In what voice or voices can Islamic heritage speak to us today,, yet relevant to our technically advanced but morally turbulent world? CPNN article: Nobel Prize for Peace to Shirin Ebadi
CPNN Administrator
Posted: Dec. 31 1999,17:00

This discussion question applies to the following articles:

Nobel Prize for Peace to Shirin Ebadi
An Islamic Response to Kairos Palestine
Le DG de l’ISESCO plaide la paix dans le monde et défend le multiculturalisme
The Director-General of ISESCO pleads for world peace and defends multi-culturalism
Hope and Signs for Long-term Peace in Syria
Back to top
Profile PM 
Naushad Dada
Posted: Oct. 24 2003,10:29

In response to this question, I would like to quote the following paragraphs from the speech made His Highness The Aga Khan at the twenty fifth year celebration of the IIS (Institute of Ismaili Studies) in London, England:

"Yet there are across the length and breadth of the Muslim world today who care for their history and heritage, who are keenly sensitive to the radically altered conditions of the modern world. They are convinced that the idea that there is some inherent, permanent division between their heritage and the world of today is a profoundly mistaken idea; and that the choice it suggests between an Islamic idea on the one hand and on the other hand, full participation in the global order of today is a false choice indeed. They seek for ways in which their societies may benefit from the intellectual and material fruits of modernity, while remaining true to their distinctive and cultural heritage".

The full text of the speech is available online.

For me, the above speech by Aga Khan and and the Nobel Prize to Shirin Ebadi, describe the situation and context within which we all need to engage ourselves in serious discussions. To me a joint approach in analyzing the issues that face both the Muslim and western world seem to be a viable option in addressing the political, cultural and social differences that we are witnessing in the secular. There seems to be tremendous opportunities in all areas of human endeavor if diverse groups within the political, intellectual, cultural and social contexts come together and discuss these issues in an open and free environment. One way that is highlighted in the speech is through the medium of education, something that peace education advocates have little problems with.

The question we need to address is "What are the ethical issues facing the world within a political, cultural, and social context ? where do we start ? how do we arrive at an equitable and just society respecting the diverse and pluralistic views of all ?: A global - multifaith, multicultural, diverse and pluralistic approach"
Back to top
Profile PM 
Guest
Posted: Oct. 24 2003,11:40

Quote (Naushad Dada @ Oct. 24 2003,12:29)
The question we need to address is "What are the ethical issues facing the world within a political, cultural, and social context ? where do we start ? how do we arrive at an equitable and just society respecting the diverse and pluralistic views of all ?: A global - multifaith, multicultural, diverse and pluralistic approach"

Thank you, Naushad, for asking us to discuss how we can arrive at a multifaith, multicultural, diverse and pluralistic approach to the future.  From the perspective of a culture of peace, this means listening to other points of view in order to understand.  Thank you for opening the dialogue.

I am personally convinced that the Muslim-Christian dialogue is of special importance because of the crusade-like character of the struggle between the Bush administration on the one hand and the Al Queda on the other hand.  I expressed this in an earlier comment on CPNN about the significance of the February peace demonstrations around the world and follow-up demonstrations in Islamic countries including Syria, Indonesia, Morocco, Algeria, Iran, Pakistan, Yemen, Bangladesh and Libya: "This could have great significance for the peace movement of the next few years. There is likely to be great struggles to determine whether these states adopt a culture of war or a culture of peace in the face of the US-led war against Islamic states.  Solidarity with peace movements in the North and elsewhere in the South could be a major determining factor."

Many North Americans are beginning to realize the importance of this dialogue, which may help explain why he have had two recent articles posted to CPNN about conflicts surrounding mosques in the US.  One was about the burning of a mosque: They firebombed a mosque in Savanah!.  The other was about public support for the building of a mosque in the face of opposition: The "Letter".

The respect for religion is basic, but that is not enough we need strong, active dialogue and solidarity based upon mutual understanding if we are to keep from being drawn into a whirlwind of fire.
Back to top
Joe
Posted: Oct. 26 2003,09:38

Quote (Naushad Dada @ Oct. 24 2003,10:29)

The question we need to address is "What are the ethical issues facing the world within a political, cultural, and social context ? where do we start ? how do we arrive at an equitable and just society respecting the diverse and pluralistic views of all ?: A global - multifaith, multicultural, diverse and pluralistic approach"

It seems to me that the "ethical" issue in question here is the choice between a culture of war and a culture of peace. More specifically, the need to deal with an atmosphere of fear and misinformation. I agree with David that dialogue, a coming together of people from many persepctives, is the only way to defeat the mutual paranoia.

It is very important to note here that the realm of international politics today is not a "clash of civilizations" or conflicting cultural norms - i.e. the eternally democratic and pluralistic Americans vs. the eternally autocratic and repressive muslims. The latter view is what many neo-cons today would have us believe. This is a form of mystification, which serves to hide the U.S. expansionist agenda based on fear and greed. I think the most important objective of the proposed dialogue should be an emphisis on the fact that "modernization" isn't synonymous with Americanization or Westernization. As soon as regular Americans realize that muslims aren't out to subvert their way of life and regular muslims realize Americans aren't out to undermine their religion, we can begin to tear down the ideological wall of "culture clash" and fear. Large steps are being made in this direction, as many CPNN articles have indicated...but there is a long way yet to go.
Back to top
Profile PM 
Naushad Dada
Posted: Oct. 26 2003,10:45

Quote (Naushad Dada @ Oct. 24 2003,10:29)
In response to this question, I would like to quote the following paragraphs from the speech made His Highness The Aga Khan at the twenty fifth year celebration of the IIS (Institute of Ismaili Studies) in London, England:

"Yet there are across the length and breadth of the Muslim world today who care for their history and heritage, who are keenly sensitive to the radically altered conditions of the modern world. They are convinced that the idea that there is some inherent, permanent division between their heritage and the world of today is a profoundly mistaken idea; and that the choice it suggests between an Islamic idea on the one hand and on the other hand, full participation in the global order of today is a false choice indeed. They seek for ways in which their societies may benefit from the intellectual and material fruits of modernity, while remaining true to their distinctive and cultural heritage".

The full text of the speech is available online.

For me, the above speech by Aga Khan and and the Nobel Prize to Shirin Ebadi, describe the situation and context within which we all need to engage ourselves in serious discussions. To me a joint approach in analyzing the issues that face both the Muslim and western world seem to be a viable option in addressing the political, cultural and social differences that we are witnessing in the secular. There seems to be tremendous opportunities in all areas of human endeavor if diverse groups within the political, intellectual, cultural and social contexts come together and discuss these issues in an open and free environment. One way that is highlighted in the speech is through the medium of education, something that peace education advocates have little problems with.

The question we need to address is "What are the ethical issues facing the world within a political, cultural, and social context ? where do we start ? how do we arrive at an equitable and just society respecting the diverse and pluralistic views of all ?: A global - multifaith, multicultural, diverse and pluralistic approach"

Joe, your comment about a better understanding and dispelling a culture of fear between cultures and faiths, seems to be key to the whole question of commencing a meaningful debate.

One of the few examples where people have come together is in the area of development, specially rural development.

When people come together to resolve a common problem e.g. developing an irrigation scheme in mountainous regions of the world, they do so without any ethnic and religious biases and in working together, they resolve a problem common to their community

In projects like these, I think their energies are completely devoted in using their minds to resolving their day to day problems and this energy seems to extend to realizing important aspects of any problem or conflict resolution; that of reason, equity, colloboration and facilitation.

I think these are very important aspects that all can enegage in as a starting point in dialoging about "managing differences".

Why is that all these aspects come into play when we are resolving developmental, technological, educational and health isssues and do not come into play for resolving highly misunderstood concepts between faiths and cultures ? After all aren't reason, merit, and facilatation skills towards building equitable societies part of any faith's understanding of the its worldly manisfestation ? [B]
Back to top
Profile PM 
Joe
Posted: Oct. 27 2003,12:03

Quote (Naushad Dada @ Oct. 26 2003,10:45)

Why is that all these aspects come into play when we are resolving developmental, technological, educational and health isssues and do not come into play for resolving highly misunderstood concepts between faiths and cultures ? After all aren't reason, merit, and facilatation skills towards building equitable societies part of any faith's understanding of the its worldly manisfestation ? [B]

It is worth repeating that FEAR is the main obstacle here, not the least because of a phenomenally one-sided view of things across the world and the tremendous power imbalance between the affluent and globalizing western powers and the largely exploited and globalized territories where many muslims live today. As you said, we have more in common that we realize. However, religious and cultural ideals aside, power imbalance and exploitation is the real situation in the world today. And that situation certainly affects the cultural/religious dialogue, no?

I would argue that transcending and critiquing this imbalance through religious and cultural dialogue is thus key. Fear and the roots of fear must be addressed for any positive gains to be made. This is the direction I think we are already heading in anyway...it's just a matter of acknowledging it as such.
Back to top
Profile PM 
Guest
Posted: Dec. 06 2003,12:40

Here is something that I consider to be important news, but there is no chance of its being reported in the Western press with its bias against peace and against Islam.

Point 3 of the final communique of the Annual Coordination Meeting of Ministers of Foreign Affairs of the Member States of the Organization of the Islamic Conference reads as follows:

3.  The Meeting underlined the importance of dialogue, understanding and mutual respect among religions and cultures and stressed the need for a long term strategy which should aim at creating and promoting a culture of pece based on harmony and understanding across religious and cultural identities.  In this regard, the Meeting recalled the initiatives from the Islamic world:  Dialogue among Civilizations-Iran; Religious and Cultural Understanding, Harmony and Cooperation-Pakistan; International Decade for a Culture of Peace and Non-Violence for the Children of the World, 2001-2010-Bangladesh; Seminar on Islam and West-Qatar.

The meeting, an annual event, took place at the United Nations in New York on 30 September, 2003.  The entire report is contained in UN document A/58/415 which is available on the UN Website.
Back to top
CPNN Administrator
Posted: Dec. 10 2003,10:03

Here is the statement released by the Nobel Peace Prize Committee on November 10, 2003, in awarding the prize to Shirin Ebadi:

The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided to award the Nobel Peace Prize for 2003 to Shirin Ebadi for her efforts for democracy and human rights. She has focused especially on the struggle for the rights of women and children.

As a lawyer, judge, lecturer, writer and activist, she has spoken out clearly and strongly in her country, Iran, and far beyond its borders. She has stood up as a sound professional, a courageous person, and has never heeded the threats to her own safety.

Her principal arena is the struggle for basic human rights, and no society deserves to be labelled civilized unless the rights of women and children are respected. In an era of violence, she has consistently supported non-violence. It is fundamental to her view that the supreme political power in a community must be built on democratic elections. She favours enlightenment and dialogue as the best path to changing attitudes and resolving conflict.

Ebadi is a conscious Muslim. She sees no conflict between Islam and fundamental human rights. It is important to her that the dialogue between the different cultures and religions of the world should take as its point of departure their shared values. It is a pleasure for the Norwegian Nobel Committee to award the Peace Prize to a woman who is part of the Muslim world, and of whom that world can be proud -- along with all who fight for human rights wherever they live.
During recent decades, democracy and human rights have advanced in various parts of the world. By its awards of the Nobel Peace Prize, the Norwegian Nobel Committee has attempted to speed up this process.

We hope that the people of Iran will feel joyous that for the first time in history one of their citizens has been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, and we hope the Prize will be an inspiration for all those who struggle for human rights and democracy in her country, in the Muslim world, and in all countries where the fight for human rights needs inspiration and support.
Back to top
Profile PM 
CPNN Administrator
Posted: Dec. 11 2003,07:38

And here are important excerpts from Shirin Ebadi's Nobel Prize lecture. . .

"Allow me to say a little about my country, region, culture and faith.

I am an Iranian. A descendent of Cyrus The Great. The very emperor who proclaimed at the pinnacle of power 2500 years ago that "... he would not reign over the people if they did not wish it." And [he] promised not to force any person to change his religion and faith and guaranteed freedom for all. The Charter of Cyrus The Great is one of the most important documents that should be studied in the history of human rights.

I am a Muslim. In the Koran the Prophet of Islam has been cited as saying: "Thou shalt believe in thine faith and I in my religion". That same divine book sees the mission of all prophets as that of inviting all human beings to uphold justice. Since the advent of Islam, too, Iran's civilization and culture has become imbued and infused with humanitarianism, respect for the life, belief and faith of others, propagation of tolerance and compromise and avoidance of violence, bloodshed and war. The luminaries of Iranian literature, in particular our Gnostic literature, from Hafiz, Mowlavi [better known in the West as Rumi] and Attar to Saadi, Sanaei, Naser Khosrow and Nezami, are emissaries of this humanitarian culture. Their message manifests itself in this poem by Saadi:

"The sons of Adam are limbs of one another
Having been created of one essence".
"When the calamity of time afflicts one limb
The other limbs cannot remain at rest".

The people of Iran have been battling against consecutive conflicts between tradition and modernity for over 100 years. By resorting to ancient traditions, some have tried and are trying to see the world through the eyes of their predecessors and to deal with the problems and difficulties of the existing world by virtue of the values of the ancients. But, many others, while respecting their historical and cultural past and their religion and faith, seek to go forth in step with world developments and not lag behind the caravan of civilization, development and progress.

The people of Iran, particularly in the recent years, have shown that they deem participation in public affairs to be their right, and that they want to be masters of their own destiny.

This conflict is observed not merely in Iran, but also in many Muslim states. Some Muslims, under the pretext that democracy and human rights are not compatible with Islamic teachings and the traditional structure of Islamic societies, have justified despotic governments, and continue to do so. In fact, it is not so easy to rule over a people who are aware of their rights, using traditional, patriarchal and paternalistic methods.

Islam is a religion whose first sermon to the Prophet begins with the word "Recite!" The Koran swears by the pen and what it writes. Such a sermon and message cannot be in conflict with awareness, knowledge, wisdom, freedom of opinion and expression and cultural pluralism.

The discriminatory plight of women in Islamic states, too, whether in the sphere of civil law or in the realm of social, political and cultural justice, has its roots in the patriarchal and male-dominated culture prevailing in these societies, not in Islam. This culture does not tolerate freedom and democracy, just as it does not believe in the equal rights of men and women, and the liberation of women from male domination (fathers, husbands, brothers ...), because it would threaten the historical and traditional position of the rulers and guardians of that culture.

One has to say to those who have mooted the idea of a clash of civilizations, or prescribed war and military intervention for this region, and resorted to social, cultural, economic and political sluggishness of the South in a bid to justify their actions and opinions, that if you consider international human rights laws, including the nations' right to determine their own destinies, to be universal, and if you believe in the priority and superiority of parliamentary democracy over other political systems, then you cannot think only of your own security and comfort, selfishly and contemptuously.

A quest for new means and ideas to enable the countries of the South, too, to enjoy human rights and democracy, while maintaining their political independence and territorial integrity of their respective countries, must be given top priority by the United Nations in respect of future developments and international relations.

The decision by the Nobel Peace Committee to award the 2003 prize to me, as the first Iranian and the first woman from a Muslim country, inspires me and millions of Iranians and nationals of Islamic states with the hope that our efforts, endeavours and struggles toward the realization of human rights and the establishment of democracy in our respective countries enjoy the support, backing and solidarity of international civil society. This prize belongs to the people of Iran. It belongs to the people of the Islamic states, and the people of the South for establishing human rights and democracy."

© THE NOBEL FOUNDATION 2003
Back to top
Profile PM 
4 replies since Oct. 24 2003,10:29 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track this question :: Email this question :: Print this question ]