Home page and navigation bar

L'accueil et la barre de navigation

La recepción y la barra de navegación

You are invited to take part in any of the discussion questions. To write a reply or change language, you must be registered (click on "Register" below) and then log in.

Vous êtes invité à participer aux forums ci-dessous. Avant d'écrire, vous devez vous enregistrer (cliquez ci-dessous) et ensuite inscrivez vous.

Usted está invitado a participar de los forums que se encuentran aquí debajo. Antes de escribir, debe registrarse (clickear abajo) y entonces conectar..

» Welcome Guest

» Log In :: Register :: Search :: Help

» Bienvenue Invité

» Inscrire :: Enregistrer :: Rechercher :: Aide

» Bienvenido Invitado

» Conectar :: Registro :: Búsqueda :: Ayuda


[ Track this question :: Email this question :: Print this question ]

Question: Sustainable Development Summits of States, What are the results? CPNN article: Youth: the Spirit of Cosmopolitanism
CPNN Administrator
Posted: Dec. 31 1999,17:00

This discussion question applies to the following articles:

Youth: the Spirit of Cosmopolitanism
People’s Summit Closing Press Conference
ICLEI’s evaluation of the outcomes of Rio+20
‘The World Is Watching and Expectations Are High’, Secretary-General Says at Intergovernmental Negotiations on Post-2015 Development Agenda
Back to top
Profile PM 
David Adams
Posted: June 26 2012,12:39

Here is a translation of an  analysis of Rio+20 by Candido Gryzbowski, one of the initiators of the World Social Forums.  For the original Portuguese, click here.

Where are we? Where are we going? How should we imagine our common destiny in intimate relationship with nature? How can we construct conditions of living and happiness for all human beings, without distinction, caring and sharing the planet that houses us? What changes do we need in the ways we organize, produce and consume, in the production of social exclusion and inequity which destroy the very basis of life? These are our questions at the end of the Rio +20 Conference, where once again our leaders have shown a lack of determination to start a major reconstruction of a world in crisis.  We have see much official pomp for nothing, creating even more uncertainty about our collective ability to change directions for the sustainability of life, all life forms, and for the integrity of the Earth. Meanwhile ... the crisis deepens and widens and the collective uncertainty increases. Rio +20 has nourished the destructive capacity of the global crisis, rather than seizing the historic moment and making the changes that are urgently needed.

We say loud and clear that the multifaceted crisis (climate and environmental, financial, food, values...), which engulfs the whole world, also has another component: the crisis of governance. This is revealed on the one hand, in the absence of a structure of global legitimate power more than what we have today. Multilateralism is exhausted and powerless against the constant threat of armed imperialism and its power of veto. It clashes with the interests of states and national sovereignty.  It is essential to add to this synthetic evaluation that the global economy today and the very health of public finances depend on the enormous power of private economic-financial corporations, for which the interests of the world are secondary to their interests of accumulating wealth. We have a world government of corporations rather than states.

On the other hand, the crisis of governance appears not only in the total lack of vision and will to change by  governments but also by the parliaments that sustain them, however limited and contradictory, within the political space that they still keep calling on the power of markets.

Even if impossible, the major tasks in the history of mankind have always been, to begin with, thoughts and dreams, before creating the conditions that made them possible. Considering the state of the world today and the pathetic Rio +20 Conference, we find a lack in the world arena of leaders with a broad political and ethical vision, generous and committed, who hear voices of the people and respond to the demands of rising global citizenship.  We need leaders who can define directions and agreements to establish democratic processes of change here and now.

It is worth noting here that the failure of the Rio +20 was somehow expected. I even wrote a series of articles about it. But there was a glimmer of hope that something could happen and the outcome could  be different. After all, politics, even democratic politics, always has some unpredictability in its results, at least regarding when and how. But this time, "efficiently" diplomacy supported the lowest common denominator, which ended up below the minimum of UNCED 1992 and below the expectations of public opinion and the various voices of the world citizens. As always, there is something positive to point out in producing this empty conference: the green economy, which they tried to sell as sustainable development, failed to receive consensus and agreement.  The big corporations, that are celebrating the collective failure of established power to change the organization of the world economy, can not celebrate total victory, because they were not given the freedom to do  business without any regulation, assaulting  nature with biotechnology, nanotechnology, and geoengineering. But the fight is not over.

What we missed more forcefully in Rio +20 was the birth of a planetary citizenship. The time has come for  an irresistible movement of citizenship for another history.  We tried to prepare for this and we came in reasonable numbers.  Not a few of us participated in the People's Summit, and also in the distant Riocentro.  As always, some of us exercised our citizen diplomacy and tried to influence the production of the final document.  We showed, especially in Flamengo Park, the vibrant and even joyful diversity of people housed by the Planet Earth. But it must be acknowledged, we lacked the people and we lacked the power to create a real democratic political force capable of reversing the game or at least threatening to do so. Also, we could not overcome our fragmentation and echoing noise. We achieved little in terms of paths for new paradigms, which was the motto that united us. We showed anger, insurgency and capacity for mobilization , but we did not yet come up with the ideas and proposals that can unite multiple and diverse dreams of many and diverse social and cultural identities, pluralism of views, analyses and ways of acting. The inability of governments in the face of their contradictions, and especially of corporate power, once again made clear in this UN conference, can only be overcome by our determination as citizens and responsible citizens, to believe and act so that other worlds are possible.  We should have no illusions: it is up to us to  make governments change.
Back to top
Profile PM 
-2 replies since June 26 2012,12:39 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track this question :: Email this question :: Print this question ]